Skip to content
Browse articles

The Puśyamitras of the Bhitari Pillar Inscription

By Jagan Nath

Vol. 22 · No. 2Jun-46pp. 112–117English, Sanskrit

Summary

This paper investigates the enigmatic ‘Puśyamitras’ mentioned in the Bhitari stone pillar inscription of Skandagupta, which records his victory over a powerful enemy with a strong army and rich treasury. Scholars have identified the Puśyamitras variously as tribes from the Purāṇas, northern peoples, Maitrakas, early Hūṇas or descendants of King Puṣyavarman of Assam. Some have proposed emending the inscription to read ‘Yudhy amitrān,’ but the author, after examining the original stone, confirms that the text reads Puśyamitras. Recent suggestions that they were the descendants of Puṣyavarman who turned from friends (mitras) of the Guptas into foes are also deemed unlikely. The article analyses linguistic features of the inscription, historical chronology and the strength of various regional powers. It concludes that the Puśyamitras were likely a tribal confederacy or breakaway group in central India who exploited the weakening Gupta empire after the Hūṇa invasions. Skandagupta’s victory over them represents a struggle to maintain imperial authority on the periphery. By reassessing textual interpretations and epigraphic evidence, the article clarifies the identity of this mysterious adversary and highlights the political instability of late Gupta India.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

The article concludes that the Puśyamitras were not the Maitrakas, Hūṇas or Puṣyavarman dynasty but a minor tribal group whose rebellion briefly threatened Gupta authority. The inscription should not be emended, as the original stone clearly reads Puśyamitras. This study demonstrates the need for cautious interpretation of epigraphic evidence and suggests that Skandagupta fought multiple regional foes during his reign.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “It is not. improbable that there wae aclash between Budhagupta and Ganapativarma in which the latter suffered a reverse, and being reduced to the position of a feudatory the use of the higher title of Maharajadhiraja had to be discarded.‘”
  • “Thus we find that Mahendravarma was the contemporary of the later Gupta king Krgnagupta, who could have established an independent kingdom, only after the decline of the Imperial Gupta dynasty, sometimes after the death of Budhagupta who held the empire in tact up to c. 495 A. D.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Indian Paleography, translated by Dr. J. F. Fleet
  2. Journal of the Assam Research Society, vol. VIIE, (५.५)
  3. Journal of the Numismatic Society of India, vol. V
  4. Indian Antiquary, 1889
  5. Age of the Imperial Guptas

Discussed in this article

People

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Jagan Nath

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Govindagupta, a new Gupta Emperor

By Jagan Nath

December - 1946
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Location of the Tchina Temple and the Original Home of the Imperial Guptas

By Jagan Nath

March - 1946

Continue reading

Related articles

The Indian Historical Quarterly

A Note on the “Pusyamitras” of the Bhitari Inscription

By Upendra Thakur

December - 1961