Skip to content
Browse articles

Puruṣottamadeva’s Commentary on the Mahābhāṣya

By Dinesh Chandra Bhattacharya

Vol. 19 · No. 3September - 1943pp. 201–213English, Sanskrit

Summary

Puruṣottamadeva’s Commentary on the Mahābhāṣya is a short but important article that reports on the discovery of fragments of a long‑lost commentary on Pāṇini’s Mahābhāṣya attributed to the Bengal grammarian Puruṣottamadeva. The author explains that the fragments, preserved only in a private library, reveal that a commentator named Śaṅkara wrote a gloss on the Mahābhāṣya and that Puruṣottamadeva composed a further commentary on it. The text, called the Prāṇapāṇa, adapts verses from earlier works and includes introductory stanzas praising the gods and gurus. Puruṣottamadeva refers to earlier scholars such as Kājjata, Śrutapāla and Sthirapila and his commentary shows familiarity with the scholarly debates current in eastern India. The article situates Puruṣottamadeva chronologically between the commentators Śrutapāla and Śaṅkara and notes that the fragments throw light on the transmission of grammatical tradition in Bengal. It reproduces two passages from the commentary and compares them with the corresponding portions of the Bhāṣavṛtti, showing Puruṣottamadeva’s method of paraphrasing and expanding Pāṇini’s aphorisms. The author also discusses the etymology of the title Prāṇapāṇa, which may imply that the commentator was prepared to stake his life on the correctness of his interpretations. Overall, the article underscores the value of these fragments for understanding the history of Indian grammatical exegesis and urges scholars to search for other pieces of this lost work.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

This note brings to light rare fragments of Puruṣottamadeva’s commentary on the Mahābhāṣya and places them within the Bengal grammatical tradition. By comparing the fragments with earlier works the author shows how they enrich our understanding of Sanskrit grammatical history and encourages further exploration of manuscript collections to recover additional portions of this commentary.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “About 20 years ago we published a rare reference to a long—lost._ com- mentaty on the Mahabhasya by Purusottamadeva, the celebrated grammarian ~of the Bengal school of Panini.*”
  • “It શવ that a small literature grew up round this work of Purusottanfa and we give below an account of the few intere'sting works that have so far been discovered, though only in fragmen'ts.”
  • “Sankara apparently based his work on three previous scholiasts ૦0 the Mababbagya viz. Kajjata, Stutapila and Purusottamadeva.”

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Dinesh Chandra Bhattacharya

All articles →
Sambodhi

Kalinjar Fort: The Time Winner Ancientmost Fort of India

By Dinesh Chandra Bhattacharya

1996
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Was Jalal-ud-Din the Patron of Rayamukuta?

By Dinesh Chandra Bhattacharya

June - 1953
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Sraddhasagara of Kulluka Bhatta

By Dinesh Chandra Bhattacharya

June - 1951
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Gaṅgādāsa and his Father Gopāladasa

By Dinesh Chandra Bhattacharya

December - 1948