Skip to content
Browse articles

Provincial Government under the Memeluke Sultans of Delhi

By A. B. M. Habibullah

Vol. 19 · No. 3September - 1943pp. 252–262English, Persian

Summary

In this study of provincial administration under the early Delhi Sultans, the author analyses how the so‑called Slave or Mamlūk rulers organised their territories through the institution of the iqṭāʿ. Contemporary chroniclers use iqṭāʿ and wilāyat interchangeably for administrative divisions. The muqṭī or governor held an iqṭāʿ not as a hereditary fief but as a bureaucratic appointment; he could be transferred or dismissed at the sultan’s will and was responsible for military defence, law and order and revenue collection. The muqṭī enjoyed latitude in assessing land revenue and maintaining troops and often struck coins in his own name, but his authority was balanced by obligations such as reciting the khuṭba and sending troops or surplus revenue to the centre. The article argues that translating iqṭāʿ as ‘fief’ is misleading because the muqṭīs were not autonomous feudal lords; rather, they were officers of a centralised regime whose privileges depended on their loyalty and performance. Drawing on Niẓām al‑Mulk’s Siyasatnama and later Indo‑Islamic chronicles, the author summarises regulations governing muqṭīs: they were forbidden to harm subjects or obstruct appeals to the sultan; they were to transfer posts periodically to prevent the growth of local power; and they maintained provincial armies at their own expense. The paper situates these arrangements within the broader context of Turkic and Seljuq administrative traditions from which the Delhi sultans borrowed. It concludes that the balance between central control and provincial autonomy shaped the political stability of the Delhi Sultanate and that later dynasties adapted but did not abandon the iqṭāʿ system.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

The article clarifies the nature of the iqṭāʿ by showing that provincial governors were salaried officers rather than feudal lords. It emphasises the regulatory framework and historical antecedents of the system and shows how administrative efficiency depended on balancing provincial initiative with central oversight.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “the non-Muslim population thus hatdly came into governmental contact with घाट sovereign race whose purpose of administra- tion turned on the smooth and regular collection of the revenue.”
  • “The word Iqta, mean- ing an administrative division, appeats to 84૪૯ been used early in Central Asian 96૩6૯5,” from which the Turks borrowed it.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Chronicles. p. 70.
  2. Cunningham, Coins of Medieval India, p. 92.
  3. Ind. Ant., 1918, p. 41.
  4. Wright, Cat. of Coins, Ind. Mus., u, p. 24, no. 77-79
  5. JRAS., vi, p. 367, no. 13.

Discussed in this article

People

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by A. B. M. Habibullah

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Reviews

By Dineshchandra Sircar, Anukul Chandra Banerjee, A. B. M. Habibullah

June - 1943
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Iranian and Indian analogues of the legend of the Holy Grail

By A. B. M. Habibullah

June - 1942
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Sultanah Raziah

By A. B. M. Habibullah

December - 1940