Skip to content
Browse articles

Select Contents of Oriental Journals

Vol. 19 · No. 4December - 1943pp. 394–399English

Summary

Annals of Oriental Research, Vol. VI, Part 2 *C. Kunhan Raja – “Poetic Beauty” Discusses how Sanskrit writers view art as intrinsic to poetry and as an expression of beauty pervading Hindu civilization. *V. Raghavan – “Udāli’s Commentary on the Rāmāyaṇa” Identifies Udāli (likely Varadarāja) as the earliest known commentator on the *Rāmāyaṇa*, dated before the 13th century. Brahmavidyā (Adyar Library Bulletin), Vol. VII, Pt. 4 (Dec 1943) *C. Kunhan Raja – “The Śarvanukramaṇī-padyavivṛti” Describes a metrical version of Kātyāyana’s *Sarvanukramaṇī* expanded by an anonymous author. *Serial Publications include: *Bhaiṣajya-mañjarī* (Nanda Paṇḍita), *Nyāyakusumāñjali* (English trans.), *Jīvananāṭakam* (Ānandanṛisiṁha), *Tripadvibhūtimahānārāyaṇopaniṣad* (Eng. trans.), *Horāśākhāmṛta* (Varāhamihira), *Āryaśālistambasūtra* (Rājanītha Dindima). *K. Mādhava Krishna Sarma – “Padārtharatnamañjūṣā” A Vaisesika text of 317 verses by Kṛṣṇadeva. *H. G. Narahari – “A Rare Commentary on the Raghuvaṃśa” Mentions Śrīnatha’s *Raghuvaṃśa-ṭīkā*, explaining variant readings absent in standard editions. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, Vol. XI, Pt. 1 *H. N. Randle – “An Indo-Aryan Language of South India: Saurashtra-bhāṣā” Describes the Saurashtra language spoken by textile workers of Madras, tracing its migration from Lāṭa and later influences from Rajasthani, Marathi, Telugu, and Tamil. *T. Burrow – “Dravidian Studies III: Developments of Indian *k* in Dravidian.” *L. D. Burnett – “A Note on an Early Indian Coin.” Reports a 1st-century B.C. coin from Lauria Nandangarh (Champaran) with a Brahmi legend naming an “Ārya Rāja,” likely a minor Videhan ruler. Journal of the Bihar Research Society, Vol. XXIX, Pt. III (Sept 1943) *P. C. Manuk – “The Patna School of Painting (19th Century).” Journal of the Bombay Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, Vol. XIX (1943) *H. D. Velankar – “Chandonuśāsana of Hemacandra.” Edits last four and a half chapters on Prākṛta metres. *P. V. Kane – “Uddyota on Vyavahāra.” Suggests *Niravadyavidyoddyota* is the same as *Uddyotana* cited in *Vyavahāranirṇaya*; Uddyota was likely a major jurist. Journal of the Ganganatha Jha Research Institute, Vol. I, Pt. 1 (Nov 1943) *R. Shama Sastry – “Kalpa or World-Cycle.” Argues “Kalpa” originally meant a 19-year eclipse cycle, not the vast 4.32 million-year period of later cosmology. *S. K. Belvalkar – “A Fake (‘Bhagavadgītā’) Manuscript.” Shows the so-called *Bhojapatri Gītā* (745 verses) is not genuine. *S. N. Sen – “Two Sanskrit Memoranda of 1787.” Reveals Sanskrit as lingua franca of India in 18th century through testimonial letters supporting Warren Hastings. *Hiriyanna – “Bhāskara’s View of Error.” Summarizes Bhāskara’s *Bhedābheda* doctrine—error arises from mistaking the adventitious for the essential. *S. K. De – “The Campū.” Explains the hybrid verse-prose form of Sanskrit narrative. *D. Bhattacharya – “The Location of Uḍḍiyāna.” Identifies Uḍḍiyāna with Vajrayoginī near Sabhar (Zahore) in East Bengal. Journal of Indian History, Vol. XXII, Pts. 2 & 3 (Aug–Dec 1943) *K. A. Nilakanta Sastri – “Aśokan Notes.” Examines the *Minor Rock Edicts*; disputes Aśoka’s dual monk-king role; defends Ceylon mission’s authenticity; rejects Kunāla story’s historicity. *S. M. Katre – “Dharmopaniṣad in Mahābhārata.” “Dharmopaniṣad” refers to esoteric duty-knowledge (*āpaddharma*). *K. Rama Pisharoti – “Vikramorvaśīyā—A Study.” *A. C. Perumallil – “The Apostles of Kalyāna.” Chronicles early Christian missions: St Bartholomew (~55 A.D.) and Pantænus (~190 A.D.) in western India. *Dasaratha Sarma – “The Imperial Pratīhāras: A Revised Study.” *S. Srinivasachari – “Tuluva Usurpation.” *P. N. Bhalla – “The Mother of the Company.” Biography of Munni Begam, consort of Nawab Mīr Jafar Khan of Murshidabad. Journal of Śrī Venkateśvara Oriental Institute, Vol. IV, No. 1 (Jan–Jun 1943) *Wilhelm Printz (tr. P. V. Rāmanujasvāmi) – “Bhāsa’s Prākrit.” Analyzes the dialectal features in dramas attributed to Bhāsa. *K. C. Varadachari – “Eros and Mystico-Religious Consciousness.” Studies Alvārs’ devotional eroticism, focusing on Tirumaṅgai’s *Mādal* poems. *N. Aiyaswami Sastri – “Gleanings from Nīlakeci.” Tamil Jain text defending Jainism against *Kundalakeci* and rival philosophies. *P. K. Gode – “New Evidence on Jagaddhara’s Date (A.D. 1275–1450).” *K. V. Nilameghacharya – “Is Nārāyaṇīya an Interpolation?” Concludes *Nārāyaṇīya* is genuine, consistent with *Bhagavad Gītā* and *Pāñcarātra*. *D. T. Tatacharya – Textual Correction in Śabarasvāmin’s Mīmāṃsā Bhāṣya. Revises *cakṣurādibhiḥ* → *kṣudrādibhiḥ* based on *Śāntarakṣita’s Tattvasaṃgraha*. Journal of the University of Bombay, Vol. XII, Pt. 2 (Sept 1943) *N. J. Shende – “Authorship of the Rāmāyaṇa.” Attributes the epic’s present seven-book form to the Bhṛgu-Aṅgiras tradition incorporating Brahmanic elements. *R. Sadasiva Aiyar – “The Rāmāyaṇa in the Light of Aristotle’s Poetics.” *A. N. Upadhye – “The Soricariṭṭa.” Describes the Prākrit *Sauricaritra* by Śītikāṇṭha. New Indian Antiquary, Vol. VI, No. 7 (Oct 1943) *Sadasiva L. Katre – “Dvijarājodaya: A Forgotten Dharma Nibandha.” Treatise on ritual timings (*Kāla*). Its author Dhīreśvara Miśra = teacher of Nīlakaṇṭha (Mahābhārata commentator). Prabuddha Bhārata, Nov 1943 *Jatīndra Bimala Chaudhuri – “Sanskrit Poet Rāmacandra Bhaṭṭa of Ayodhyā.” Identifies him (brother of Vallabha Ācārya) as author of *Kṛṣṇakuṭibālā-kāvya* and *Rasikārañjana*; patronised by Vīrasimha of Ayodhyā (16th c.). *Akṣaya Kumar Banerjea – “The Śiva-Śakti Cult of Yogī Gorakṣanātha.” Philosophical exposition of *Śiva* and *Śakti* as one absolute reality; multiplicity as emanation of divine power.

Summary reviewed by a volunteer editor.

Conclusion

The Select Contents of Oriental Journals compilation stands as a concise mirror of mid-20th-century Indological scholarship, showcasing the breadth and rigor of Oriental research in Sanskrit studies, linguistics, philosophy, and history. It reveals a vibrant academic landscape where traditional Indian texts�from the Vedas and Upani?ads to Tamil Jain works and Puranic commentaries�were being critically edited, contextualized, and interpreted through modern philological methods. The range of topics�spanning poetics, religion, epigraphy, linguistics, and cross-cultural history�demonstrates a deep continuity between India�s classical heritage and evolving global scholarship. In essence, this compilation captures a pivotal scholarly moment: the systematic rediscovery, authentication, and comparative analysis of India�s intellectual tradition at the intersection of ancient insight and modern academic precision.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The purpose of the paper 15 to show that according to the prominent Sanskrit writers, art constitutes the essential elements 10 poetry, and that love of bzauty manifests 10521 in every phase of Hindu”
  • “The expression dbarmopa- nisad contained 10 the Critical Edition of फीट Mahiabharata points to the application of secret knowledge (upanisad) for the Performance of duties in time of difficulty (apaddharma).”

Works cited in this article

  1. Brahmavidya (Adyar Library Bulletin), vol. V11, pt. 4. (December, 1048)
  2. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, vol. 21, pt. 1
  3. Journal of the Bombay Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, . ૪૦1. X1X, 1943
  4. Journal of the Ganganatha Jha Researoh 1005111010, vol. I, pt, 1 (November, 1043)
  5. Journal of 8ri Venkatesvara Oriental 10111019, ૪૦1. IV, 0૦.

Discussed in this article

People

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.