Skip to content
Browse articles

Who wrote the Bhasapariccheda ?

By Dinesh Chandra Bhattacharya

Vol. 17 · No. 2June - 1941pp. 241–244English
Manuscript Colophon Evidence

Summary

This short article investigates the authorship of the Nyāya primer Bhāsāpariccheda (also known as Bhāṣāpariccheda). The treatise, widely studied in traditional logic curricula, has long been attributed to Viśvanātha Pañcānana, whose commentaries such as Muktāvalī and Siddhāntamuktāvalī are well known. The author of the article reports the discovery of a two‑hundred‑year‑old manuscript whose colophon credits the work to a different author, Śrī Kṛṣṇadāsa, raising doubts about Viśvanātha’s authorship. Examining internal evidence and cross‑referencing other manuscripts and commentaries, the article notes that some versions describe the author as “the son of Viśvanātha,” while others give titles like Śrīnivāsa or Śrīdhara. The author reviews secondary literature and concludes that Viśvanātha likely authored the main commentary Muktāvalī but that the core Bhāsāpariccheda may have been written by a pupil or relative, with later scribes conflating their names. The article emphasises the need for critical editions of Nyāya texts based on multiple manuscripts to establish accurate authorship and transmission.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

Uncertainty over who composed the Bhāsāpariccheda highlights the complexities of textual transmission in Indian scholastic traditions. The article suggests that while Viśvanātha Pañcānana’s commentarial work is well attested, the basic compendium may stem from another scholar in his circle. Accurate attribution requires systematic collation of manuscripts rather than reliance on later printed editions.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “About seven years ago ત Ms. copy of घाट well known work of Visvanatha Pafcanana came to our hands; it is about 200 years old and curiously enough contained the following colophon : —”
  • “The text of the Bhasapariccheda does not contain the name of the author except 10 the colophon, but one of the introductory verses of the Muksavali clearly records the name in 165 1356 line as follows: —”
  • “There 15 an old commentary directly on the Muktavali by a distinguished Bengali scholar Rudra(-deva) Tarkavagisa—practically the only commentary written in Bengal, where the study of this elementary work was not much 10 demand 10 the hey-day of Navyanyaya studies.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Balamanorama
  2. Madras, 1920, p- 259
  3. Sabdaloka-viveka
  4. Anumana-didbiti-prasarini
  5. Jayadeva's Aloka

Discussed in this article

People

  • Bhavinanda
  • Visvanatha Pafcanana
  • Ramarudra Bhatta
  • Gunananda Vidyavagisa
  • Rudranatha Nyayavicaspati
  • Yatindranatha Tarkatirtha
  • Nilakantha Bhatta
  • Rudradeva Tarkavagisa

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Dinesh Chandra Bhattacharya

All articles →
Sambodhi

Kalinjar Fort: The Time Winner Ancientmost Fort of India

By Dinesh Chandra Bhattacharya

1996
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Was Jalal-ud-Din the Patron of Rayamukuta?

By Dinesh Chandra Bhattacharya

June - 1953
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Sraddhasagara of Kulluka Bhatta

By Dinesh Chandra Bhattacharya

June - 1951
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Gaṅgādāsa and his Father Gopāladasa

By Dinesh Chandra Bhattacharya

December - 1948