Skip to content
Browse articles

India and the Archaeology of Malaysia and Indonesia

By Kalidas Nag

Vol. 16 · No. 3September - 1940pp. 462–483English

Summary

The second article emphasises the growing recognition of the Malayan world’s importance for anthropology and archaeology. The author distinguishes two major divisions of Malays: the Oceanic Malays, a maritime people spread across an 'oceanic domain' from Formosa to Madagascar, and the Continental Malays inhabiting the Malay Peninsula and Indo‑China. Drawing on Dr. J. H. Hutton’s work on ‘Races of Further Asia’, he explains that Proto‑Malays formed hybrid groups through fusion with Negritos, Papuans, pre‑Dravidians and Indonesians. These fusions produced present‑day Malays of dark‑brown complexion. French scholars’ research has shown cultural links between Madagascar and the Malayan world, and discoveries by the École Française d'Extrême‑Orient in Indo‑China are yielding valuable archaeological material. The article argues that understanding Proto‑Malays and Malays will illuminate the expansion of primitive peoples from Africa to Melanesia across the Indian Ocean. The article traces several waves of migration. It identifies the Negritos as the earliest dark race in Malaysia and South East Asia. These people were hunter‑gatherers with bows and arrows; agriculture and animal domestication were unknown to them. Later came Oceanic Negroes, including the Papuasian branch, traces of whom remain among tribes in Assam and other regions. The next group was the Indonesians, described as a Caucasoid stock modified by Mongoloid influence; their culture encompassed polished stone adzes, tattooing, canoe‑drums, head‑hunting and megalithic monuments. Dr. Hutton suggests that the origins of the Indonesian and Mon‑Khmer cultures lie in Southern India, implying that pre‑Aryan India could yield fruitful insights into Asian prehistory. The article surveys discoveries across the Malay Archipelago, Indo‑China, Borneo and the Philippines, including Neolithic stone axes, megalithic structures and pottery. It outlines the spread of agriculture, terrace cultivation and buffalo‑plough farming. Megalithic culture and head‑hunting, together with phallic cults, terrace rice cultivation and matrilineal social structures, are identified as characteristic features shared by Indonesian societies. The author also summarises archaeological work at sites such as Kedah, South Sumatra and the Mekong Valley, highlighting inscriptions, bronze sculptures and stone implements. Overall, the article argues that systematic exploration of Malaysia and Indonesia will contribute to understanding the diffusion of races, languages and cultures across South and Southeast Asia and will help clarify the role of Indian influence in the archipelago.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

The article concludes that the Malayan world provides a crucial bridge linking Africa, India and the Pacific. It emphasises that Proto‑Malays emerged from mixtures of Negrito, Papuan and pre‑Dravidian stocks and later mingled with Indonesian migrants. Distinctive cultural traits—megalithic monuments, head‑hunting, tattooing and terrace cultivation—appear throughout the region and may trace their origins to southern India. By charting these migrations and cultural transmissions, the author advocates interdisciplinary research to understand how prehistoric populations moved and interacted across the Indian Ocean, thereby illuminating the shared heritage of Southeast Asia and India.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “present day Malays with dark-brown skin may thus very probably be the result of the fusion of the Yellow races from the North with the Black races of Southern Asia.”
  • “Far from being confined to present Melanesta, the geogra- phical extension of the composite Melanesoid culture takes ઘડ to the Tumba culture of West Aftica where according ૦ 12 Menghin, we find “‘artifacts bearing a strong resemblance to the palzolithic types of Western Europe like Chellean, Levalloisian or Mousterian.””
  • “દ seems now improbable that influences from India played a part in the development of the Melanesoid civilisations, and the theory that the cultures found पा Malaysia had their origin solely or mainly from Tonkin (Hoabin- hian) can no [ટલ be maintained.””

Works cited in this article

  1. Bulletin of the Raffles Museum, Singapore, Series 6. No: 1, May, 1936
  2. "Early Man"
  3. Liang Shu

Discussed in this article

People

  • Dr. Callenfels
  • Dr. Hutton
  • Dr. Quaritch Wales
  • Dubois
  • Kaundinya 4
  • Dr. B. S. Guha

Places

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Article order

In this issue

Vol. 16 · No. 3

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Kalidas Nag

All articles →
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

The Universal Message of Jainism

By Kalidas Nag

April - 2001
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

International University of Non‑Violence (Encyclopedia Asiana)

By Kalidas Nag

January - 1998
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

The Universal Message of Jainism

By Kalidas Nag

Jan 1967
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Reviews

By Kalidas Nag, A. B. M. Habibullah, Arthur Berriedale Keith

March - 1938