Skip to content
Browse articles

Proto-Indian Ceramics

By S. Srikanta Sastri

Vol. 16 · No. 3September - 1940pp. 511–523English

Summary

The article considers the importance of studying pottery for understanding the proto‑history of India. Inspired by the work of archaeologists like Flinders Petrie and Arthur Evans, who used ceramic typology to reconstruct prehistoric chronology, the author argues that Indian excavations have yielded abundant ceramic material but lack a systematic classification. Without such classification, it is difficult to trace the development of Indian cultures and their connections to neighbouring regions. The author proposes a preliminary classification of proto‑Indian ceramics. The earliest stage is represented by sun‑baked pottery of brown and grey colours, comparable to the earliest pottery from Susa, Troy and Egyptian predynastic sites. The next stage is characterised by potter’s wheel‑made reddish ware, some with slip coatings and simple incised decorations. This phase is associated with the Neolithic to early Chalcolithic cultures and shows affinities to Iranian and Central Asian ceramics. The third stage features polished grey and black ware, often painted with geometric designs. This stage corresponds to the Chalcolithic and early Bronze Age cultures, such as those at Harappa and Mohenjo‑daro. The final stage includes polychrome glazed ware, which appears at sites like Taxila and Sirkap and may be attributed to Hellenistic or Western Asian influence. The article emphasises that pottery shapes also evolved. Early forms include globular jars, bowl‑shaped vessels and deep basins, while later periods introduced long‑necked pots, spouted jars and decorative stands. Colour and surface treatment progressed from rough, undecorated ware to polished, slipped and painted surfaces, culminating in glazed and moulded ceramics. The author stresses that the variety of shapes and decorations reflects both functional and cultural factors. By surveying pottery from excavations across India and comparing them with Iranian, Mesopotamian and Central Asian ceramics, the article attempts to outline the chronological evolution of proto‑Indian pottery. It calls for more detailed stratigraphic excavations and laboratory analyses to refine the classification and to use ceramics as a key to reconstruct early Indian history.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

The article concludes that pottery should be treated as a primary source for India’s proto‑history. A systematic classification of ceramics, based on fabric, colour, shape and decoration, can reveal chronological sequences and cultural interactions. The proposed stages—sun‑baked brown ware, wheel‑made red ware, polished grey and black ware, and polychrome glazed ware—offer a framework for further research. The author urges archaeologists to adopt ceramic typology and stratigraphy in Indian excavations, emphasising that a well‑developed pottery sequence will help link Indian cultures to broader Near Eastern and Central Asian traditions and illuminate the emergence of urban civilisation in the subcontinent.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The excavations at Chanhu-Dare prove, according to Mackay, the existence of three stages of culture on -that site and since he has made an attempt. to fix the chronology of the Harappa, Jhukar and Jhangar cultures, it 15 necessary to examine by a com-parative study of pottery, whether his system of chronology can be taken as proved.”
  • “The Indus ware 15 unique in having black or red. The pale ware of M. D. has a comb design, probably a conventionalised bull.”
  • “There seems 00 doubt that the pottery of the Jhukar culture has been influenced by the wares of Tell Halaf culture, and we must look to the Iranian Highlands for the region whence it was brought છ India.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Bulletin of the School of Indic Studies, Boston.
  2. Childe, New light on the Most Ancient.
  3. Seton Lloyd, Mesopotamia.
  4. Noeldeke—Uruk-Warka; Childe, New Light etc.
  5. K. N. Dikshit, Prebistoric Civilisation of the Indus Valley.

Discussed in this article

People

  • Mackay
  • Dr. Mackay
  • Sir Arthur Evans
  • Prof. 5. V. Venkatesvara
  • Sir Flinders Petrie

Places

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Article order

In this issue

Vol. 16 · No. 3

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by S. Srikanta Sastri

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Paramārthasāra and Śrī Bhāgavata

By S. Srikanta Sastri

Jun-46
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Sri Śaṅkara in Cambodia?

By S. Srikanta Sastri

June - 1942
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Advaitacaryas of the 12th and 13th Centuries

By S. Srikanta Sastri

June - 1938
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Date of the Mudra-Raksasa

By S. Srikanta Sastri

March - 1931