Skip to content
Browse articles

Advaitacaryas of the 12th and 13th Centuries

By S. Srikanta Sastri

Vol. 14 · No. 2June - 1938pp. 401–408English

Summary

Surveying the development of Advaita Vedanta during a period when rival schools like Visistadvaita and Dvaita flourished, this article reconstructs the succession of Advaita teachers in the 12th and 13th centuries. Beginning with the early dating of Sankara (pre‑620 CE), it outlines the two main interpretive traditions: the Vivarana school and the Bhamati school. Biographical sketches and approximate dates are provided for figures such as Jñanaghana, Prakasatman, Gaudaprajña (Citsukha), Anandagiri, Vidyāranya and others. The article notes their commentaries on the Brahma‑sūtra‑bhāṣya, the scholastic debates between Vivaranakas and Bhamatiyas, and the infusion of ritual and yogic elements into Advaita practice. A genealogical chart summarises the relationships between teachers and disciples. By situating these thinkers chronologically, the study clarifies how Advaita responded to critiques, developed new sub‑traditions and maintained doctrinal continuity during a transformative era.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

By reconstructing the lineage of Advaita scholars during the 12th and 13th centuries, the article clarifies how the tradition evolved in dialogue with rival schools. Mapping the succession of teachers helps identify when key commentaries and treatises appeared and how interpretive lines diverged. Understanding these connections reveals the dynamism of Advaita, which continually responded to criticism while deepening its metaphysics. This chronological framework aids future scholars in contextualising texts and appreciating the rich intra‑school debates that shaped Vedanta.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “In पीट history of the development of the various Advaitic Schools, the period which witnessed the rise of Visistadvaita and Dvaita 15 of importance, because it shows the state of the Advaita philosophy and the criticisms provoked by it.”
  • “Therefore 1t is not possible that Sumhagiet was 1150 known as Gaudgsvaracirya.”
  • “The date of Citsukha 15 cherefore ૮. 1200 A.D. and that of his guru 15 probably ૮. 1:80 A.D.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Tattvasamgraba, GOS., Intro.
  2. Pramana Lakgana, JOR., 1937; Mad. Uni. Journdl, 1937.
  3. Istasiddbi, GCS., p. 375.
  4. Praméya Kamala Martanda.
  5. Kalpatars, 1247-1260 A.D.

Discussed in this article

People

  • Sankara 80
  • Anandagiri 8
  • Citsukha
  • Ananyanubhava
  • Sukha-prakasa
  • Ananditman
  • Vidyasankara
  • Bodhaghana
  • Anandinubhava
  • Sankarananda
  • Amalinanda
  • Sarvajiatman
  • Sureivara
  • Prakasarma Yati
  • Jianaghana

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Article order

In this issue

Vol. 14 · No. 2

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by S. Srikanta Sastri

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Paramārthasāra and Śrī Bhāgavata

By S. Srikanta Sastri

Jun-46
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Sri Śaṅkara in Cambodia?

By S. Srikanta Sastri

June - 1942
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Proto-Indian Ceramics

By S. Srikanta Sastri

September - 1940
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Date of the Mudra-Raksasa

By S. Srikanta Sastri

March - 1931