Skip to content
Browse articles

The Causeway of Giants at Angkor Thom

By George Coedès

Vol. 14 · No. 3September - 1938pp. 607–612English

Summary

Georges Cœdès examines the symbolic meaning of the bridges at Angkor Thom whose balustrades are formed by two enormous nāga serpents with bodies supported by stone giants. The prevailing interpretation is that these sculptures depict the churning of the ocean (samudramanthana), but Cœdès summarises Paul Mus’s alternative view that they represent the rainbow which links the human world with that of the gods. Mus bases his interpretation on a verse from a Sanskrit inscription by Jayavarman VII that compares the causeway to a rainbow connecting heaven and earthimage/. Cœdès agrees that the motif may symbolise more than the churning and suggests it embodies multiple layers of meaning: the rainbow as a cosmic link, the serpent as the ocean and the giants as churning gods. He notes that similar balustrades appear on other 12th‑century Khmer monuments and that Jayavarman VII named parts of Angkor Thom after mountains and oceans, strengthening the cosmic interpretation. The author concludes that the arrangement of moat, outer wall and causeway could represent a ritual churning, intended to produce prosperity and victory for the kingdomimage/. By integrating architectural, epigraphic and mythological evidence, Cœdès offers a nuanced reading of the causeway that combines Indian and Khmer symbolism.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

Cœdès reinterprets the bridges at Angkor Thom by combining the traditional churning‑of‑the‑ocean motif with Paul Mus’s suggestion that they symbolise the rainbow linking heaven and earth. He argues that Jayavarman VII’s use of cosmic names for the moat and walls supports this reading and that the causeways may have been conceived as a ritual churning to ensure prosperity. The article demonstrates the rich interplay of Indian and Khmer symbolism in Khmer architecture and encourages a multi‑layered approach to interpreting its iconography.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “This motif which is found also in other monuments of the same period (end of the 12th century A.D.) 1s generally interpreted’ as the representation of the churning of the ocean, an architectural symbolism of which there are other examples.’”
  • “M. Paul Mus finds in these bridges of Angkor Thom a representation of the rainbow which according to Indian tradition is the link of union between the world of men and the world of gods which is materialised on earth by the royal city.”
  • “The rainbow is the bow of Indra and the presence of that god at the end of the bridge in the axis of the nagas cerrainly confirms the hypo- thesis of M, Paul Mus.”

Works cited in this article

  1. C. J. Commaille, Gwide awx ruines d' Angkor, p. 110
  2. H. Marchal, Guide archéologique aux Temples d'Angkor, p. 85
  3. G. Coedés, Inscriptions dw Cambadge, 1, p. 31
  4. G. Coedés, Inscriptions dw Cambadge, 1, pp. 70-71
  5. G. de Coral-Rémusat, 'Influences javanaises dans l'art de Roldoh', CCXXIN, 1933, p. 190

Discussed in this article

People

  • M. Paul Mus
  • Jayavarman VII
  • G. de Coral-Rémusat
  • G. Capes
  • P. C. Bagchi 8
  • C. J. Commaille
  • H. Marchal
  • G. Coedés

Places

  • Angkor Thom
  • Java 17
  • Angkor Vat
  • Bayon
  • Bakong
  • Phnom Penh

Texts & works

  • Causeway of Giants at Angkor Thom

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.