Skip to content
Browse articles

Army and War in Mediaeval Ceylon

By Wilhelm Geiger

Vol. 14 · No. 3September - 1938pp. 511–531English

Summary

Drawing on Sinhalese chronicles and epigraphic sources, W. Geiger analyses the composition and tactics of the Sinhalese army in the mediaeval period. He notes that the army consisted of mercenaries and militia: mercenaries were often foreigners from the Tamil, Kerala and Kannada regions who were paid by the king, while the militia comprised free Sinhalese peasants compelled to serve in wartimeimage/. The terms yodha and bhāta refer to soldiers, and the chroniclers praise valour using the epithet sīra (“hero”). Geiger points out that archery was highly developed; bows and arrows were the principal weapons and chronicles often describe showers of arrows raining on the enemyimage/. Special arrows such as gokarṇaka were used against elephants and archers were organised into corps led by royal princes. The article discusses whether poisoned arrows were used and concludes that reports of poison arrows probably reflect foreign practices imported by Ramaṇa and Jāvaka invaders rather than native Sinhalese customimage/. Geiger also examines war elephants, cavalry, armour and the use of battle axes and notes that infantry carried swords, spears and shields. He analyses military organisation, describing how rulers maintained standing troops in fortresses and summoned militia when needed. Strongholds were defended by walls, moats and bastions; the chronicles describe sieges where defenders rained arrows and missiles on attackers and sallied out to set enemy siege engines on fire. The author concludes that the Sinhalese army relied on mercenaries for manpower but that indigenous tactics such as massed archery and fortified positions were decisive in defence. By comparing the chronicles with foreign accounts, he suggests that the Ceylonese developed a distinct martial tradition that blended indigenous practices with imported elements.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

Geiger’s study shows that medieval Sinhalese armies were composed of both mercenaries from South India and native militia, and that bows and arrows formed their principal weapons. Chronicles emphasise archery, war elephants and fortified strongholds, while references to poisoned arrows likely reflect foreign influences rather than local practice. Although the monarchy depended on mercenaries for manpower, indigenous tactics—especially massed archery and the strategic use of forts—gave the Sinhalese a distinctive form of warfare. Understanding this blend of imported and native elements deepens our appreciation of Sri Lanka’s martial history.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “Mercenaries and militia were the two constituent parts of the Sinbalese army in the mediaeval period”
  • “The militia is called ‘the army dwelling in the country’ (ratthavasika sena Mbvs. 70-89, 75. 102) and were agriculturists who were tilling and watering their fields”
  • “The traditional name in India for a complete army is the four-rhembered army ‘(sena caturangini in the ancient Mfabavamsa”

Works cited in this article

  1. H. W. Codrington, Short Hist. of Ceylon, pp. 64-70
  2. G.C. Mendis, Early Hist. of Ceylon, pp. 83-85
  3. Wickremasinghe, Epigr. Zeyl., II. 247
  4. Yule and Burnell, Hobson-Jobson s.v. Thakoor
  5. Journal R.A. Soc., Ceylon Br. XXII, no. 67, 1914, p. 288

Discussed in this article

People

Places

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Wilhelm Geiger

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Language of the Vaddas

By Wilhelm Geiger

September - 1935
The Indian Historical Quarterly

New Contributions to the Interpretation of the Mahavamsa

By Wilhelm Geiger

March - 1933
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Trustworthiness of the Mahavamsa

By Wilhelm Geiger

June - 1930
The Indian Historical Quarterly

A Short History of Ceylon

By Wilhelm Geiger

March - 1926