Skip to content
Browse articles

Origin and Early History of Caityas

By V. R. Ramachandra Dikshitar

Vol. 14 · No. 3September - 1938pp. 440–451English

Summary

The article explores the origins of the term caitya and traces the early development of caitya worship. In Buddhist literature caitya is a generic term for sacred precincts including monasteries, trees, stupas, memorial stones and shrines. Drawing on the Vedic ritual of cayaṇa (piling up a sacrificial altar) and the root ci (“to collect or build”), the author argues that caitya originally referred to any structure or object consecrated by ritual piling. He cites passages from the Śatapatha and Taittirīya Samhitas where caitya denotes mounds erected over sacrificial posts and points out that caityas pre‑date Buddhism and were adopted by Hindus and Jains. Through a survey of early Buddhist texts he shows that the Buddha visited caityas associated with local deities and that early monks revered trees and stones at these sites. The author emphasises that the earliest caityas were not exclusively Buddhist but formed part of a wider pan‑Indian tradition of ancestor and deity worship. By examining derivations such as cittiya (Pali) and cit̩ʰiya (Prakrit) he argues that the word’s original connotation is “heaped up” or “piled”. He also analyses archaeological remains of prehistoric cairns and megalithic circles, linking them to later brick and stone caityas. The article concludes that the worship of caityas grew out of Vedic practices, that caityas were adopted by various religious communities and that only later did the term become associated primarily with Buddhist stupas and monasteries.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

The study shows that caityas are not a uniquely Buddhist institution but derive from Vedic practices of piling sacrificial altars and building memorial mounds. Early texts and archaeological evidence indicate that caityas encompassed trees, stupas, stones and shrines used by Hindus, Buddhists and Jains. Because the term simply denoted a consecrated heap or sanctuary, it was adopted by different traditions and only later came to be associated chiefly with Buddhist stupas. Recognising the pre‑Buddhist origin of caityas clarifies the continuity between Vedic sacrificial culture and later Indian temple architecture.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “Hence all edifices having the character of दा sacred monument ૩૯ caityas, but not all caityas are”
  • “Thus we see both the terms citya and caitya are correlated and con- noted cne and the same thing in the second half of the Vedic period.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Martin Havg—Transl. of Ait. Br, V.
  2. Sabdakalpadruma
  3. Garudacayana-yiga
  4. Arthasastra (Bk. V. 2)
  5. Mahaparinibbanasutta

Discussed in this article

People

Places

  • Tiruvadi
  • Virasola civer
  • Tiruvadamarudiir
  • Bhojanagara
  • Ceylon 41

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by V. R. Ramachandra Dikshitar

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

L-tsing’s India

By V. R. Ramachandra Dikshitar

March - 1952
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Aryanisation of East India (Assam)

By V. R. Ramachandra Dikshitar

March - 1945
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Tamil Saiva Mystic Poets in Medieval South India

By V. R. Ramachandra Dikshitar

June - 1943
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Early Tamil Religious Literature

By V. R. Ramachandra Dikshitar

March - 1942