Skip to content
Browse articles

The History of Bhavika in Sanskrit Poetics

By V. Raghavan

Vol. 14 · No. 4December - 1938pp. 787–798English

Summary

V. Raghavan traces the development of the concept of bhāvika (bhāvikatva), a literary quality in Sanskrit poetics. He begins with Bhāmaha, who mentions bhāvikatva as a guṇa pervading an entire composition rather than a single verse. Raghavan notes that Bhāmaha’s contemporaries considered bhāvikatva a form of alaṃkāra, but later poets such as Daṇḍin distinguished between bhāvikatva and rasavat. Through readings of the Kāvyādarśa, Nāṭyaśāstra and commentaries by Ānandavardhana and Abhinavagupta, he shows how bhāvikatva evolved to mean the quality that evokes the natural presentation of time and space in a composition. He discusses examples where poets depict past and future events with such vividness that they appear present to the reader and explores how the concept intersects with rasadhvani, vakrokti and aucitya. The article analyses the debate on whether bhāvikatva is an alaṃkāra or a component of rasa theory, noting that later theorists like Mammata considered it a prerequisite for rasa. Raghavan concludes that bhāvikatva underlines the poet’s ability to make readers emotionally present in the imagined world, bridging the gap between description and experience.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

Raghavan’s examination reveals that bhāvikatva occupies a critical nexus between poetic technique and emotional experience. Its evolution from Bhāmaha’s broad notion of compositional excellence to later theorists’ nuanced discussions highlights the dynamic nature of Sanskrit literary criticism. Recognising bhāvikatva as both an expressive device and a condition for rasa enriches our understanding of how classical Indian poets crafted immersive narratives that transcend time and space.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “Bhimaha here speaks of a concept which 13૯ calls a guna, not of vakya, but of the prabandha 35 a whole.”
  • “What 15 this bhavikatva? Bhimaha defines this 85 the quality which pertamns to that part ए a composition where the 1deas of घाट past and the future presented by पीट poet are so vivid &5 to look like belonging to the present.”
  • “As one reads the poem, it should begin to live before his eyes: that 15, it should appear before the mind's cye of the reader that the story 15 happening 10 his very presence.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Anargharaghava
  2. Hemacandra
  3. Naisedhiya Carita
  4. Pratiharenduraja
  5. Vidyacakravarttin

Discussed in this article

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by V. Raghavan

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Subandhu’s Vasavadattānṛtadhārā

By V. Raghavan

December - 1944
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Ganapatika

By V. Raghavan

June - 1942
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Govinda Bhatta the real name of Akabariya Kalidasa

By V. Raghavan

June - 1941
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Vanga and Vangala

By V. Raghavan

September - 1936

Continue reading

Related articles

Sambodhi

Sanskrit Aesthetics

By V. M. Kulkarni

1982-1983