Skip to content
Browse articles

The Significance of the Vedic Rite Pumsavana

By Jitendra Bimal Chaudhuri

Vol. 14 · No. 4December - 1938pp. 831–835English

Summary

Jitendra Bimal Chaudhuri focuses on the Pumsavana, a Vedic rite performed during pregnancy. He argues that the common belief that this rite ensures the birth of a male child is a misunderstanding. Analysing the etymology of the term, Chaudhuri shows that ‘pums’ denotes human beings rather than males exclusively. He describes the ritual procedure, wherein the husband and priests place shoots of a sacred plant into the wife’s nostrils while reciting prayers to remove any evil affecting the embryo. Citing commentaries by Gopatha Brāhmaṇa and Bodhayana, he asserts that the rite’s main purpose is to avert miscarriage and ensure safe development of the fetus. The article clarifies that masculine terms in Vedic texts often have gender‑neutral meanings and that the Pumsavana is a protective ritual meant for both male and female fetuses.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

Chaudhuri’s examination demystifies the Pumsavana rite by returning to its etymological and ritual context. He shows that ‘pums’ signifies human beings rather than males alone, exposing the gender bias in later interpretations. The analysis underscores that the rite’s original intention was to ensure the wellbeing of any fetus by warding off evil influences. This clarification challenges interpretations that align ancient rites with patriarchal desires and contributes to a more balanced understanding of Vedic ritual practice.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “But there 15 evidence to show that घाट pumsavana 15 a rite performed with the object of averting any evil to the progeny and of having either a male or a female child as desired.”
  • “The word ‘Pums’™ in the name of ‘Pumsavana’ refers to both male and female and does not at all debar the use of ‘Uha’ whenever necessary.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Monice-Williams, A Sanskrit—English Dictionary, Oxford, Clarendon Dress, 1899, p. 630, Column 3.
  2. Samskara-paddhati, Poona, 1924, p. 91, line 3
  3. Caland’s ed., Lahore, 1925, p. 131, Ch. 24
  4. Gobhila-parilista, iriddha-kalpa, Bib. Ind., Calcutta, 1909, p. :86
  5. Asvalayana-irautasatra

Discussed in this article

People

  • Laugaksi

Texts & works

  • Pumsavana
  • Rgveda 69
  • Jata-karman
  • Asvalayana-grbya-siitra
  • Simantonnayana
  • Kathaka-grbya-sétra
  • Baud?. 07.5
  • Maitra. G.S.
  • Kamya-sraddhas
  • Bhamad
  • Upodghata
  • Asvalayana-irautasatra
  • Grhya-siitras
  • Garbha-samskaras

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Jitendra Bimal Chaudhuri

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Position of Wives other than the first in the Vedic Ritual

By Jitendra Bimal Chaudhuri

December - 1941
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Position of Wives other than the first in the Vedic Ritual

By Jitendra Bimal Chaudhuri

June - 1941
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Wife in the Vedic Ritual

By Jitendra Bimal Chaudhuri

March - 1940
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Initiation of Women

By Jitendra Bimal Chaudhuri

March - 1939