Skip to content
Browse articles

Side-Lights on the Later Kusanas

By Adris Banerji

Vol. 13 · No. 1March - 1937pp. 105–116English
Numismatic Historical Evidence

Summary

Using numismatic, epigraphic and archaeological evidence, this article reconstructs the obscure later period of the Kusana dynasty after the reign of Vasudeva I. It begins by analysing late Kusana coins discovered in Sindh and Rajasthan, noting their iconography and metallurgical features. The author discusses rectangular and oblong coins with altar and fire motifs that lack legends, suggesting they were local issues that replaced earlier imperial currency. Inscriptions from Persepolis and Kabul mention viceroys and satraps, indicating that the Sasanian Empire exercised overlordship over former Kusana territories. The article examines fragmentary records which describe conflicts among heirs of the Sasanian king Narseh and list dependent kings of Paradas, Makran and other regions. Evidence from excavations at Jhukar and Mohenjo‑Daro reveals glazed pottery and terracotta seals showing Sasanian influence. Using this material, the author reconstructs a “dark period” in which the Kusana realm shrank to the Kabul Valley and was eventually absorbed by invading Huns. The narrative integrates perspectives from Chinese chronicles, Persian inscriptions and Indian epigraphy to illuminate how regional powers vied for control in Central and North‑west India during the 3rd–4th centuries AD.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

The study concludes that after Vasudeva I, the Kusana Empire rapidly disintegrated under pressure from the rising Sasanian Empire and nomadic incursions. Coin evidence and inscriptions show that local rulers issued currency and acknowledged Sasanian suzerainty. Excavations demonstrate cultural exchanges between Persia and the Indus region. Ultimately, the Kusanas retreated to the Kabul Valley before being overrun by the Huns, marking the end of their hegemony.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “It 15 now known that one of the causes was the rise of ત new imperahsuc power in Asia—the dynasty founded by Ardashir 1 (૮. 224-241 A.D.); the other causes being internal dissensions, and a succession છ weak rulers.”
  • “The Sassantan conquest of certain parts of [1લી was being suggested for a 1012 time, but strong evidences bad 110૬ so long been forthconung.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Gibbon, Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, vol. 1, p. 140.
  2. Numismatique, 1898, p. 149: FASE. pp. 88-99.
  3. IRAS, 1929, pp. 244.
  4. Rawlinson, The Seventh Grear Oriental Monarchy, London, 1876, p. 107.
  5. Herzfeld, Kushano-Sassanian Coins, Memairs of the Archeological Survey of India, No. 38, p. 35.

Discussed in this article

People

  • Varhran
  • Narse
  • Varhran 1
  • Kaniska 24
  • Hormizd
  • Shahpuhr
  • Narseh
  • Slok
  • Visudeva 1
  • Varhran 11
  • Hormizd II
  • Ardashir 1

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Adris Banerji

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Pre-Historic Mewar—An Appraisal

By Adris Banerji

June & Sept. 1962
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Coins of the Dark Age

By Adris Banerji

June & Sept. 1961
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Bihar Megaliths & Rock Carvings

By Adris Banerji

March - 1960
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Studies on Basarh Sealings I

By Adris Banerji

December - 1955