Rohitagiri of the Rampal Copper-plate
Summary
Haridas Mitra's article in the *Forward Historical Quarterly* critiques N.K. Bhattasali's readings of the unfinished Kedarpur copper-plate of Sricandradeva, particularly focusing on the Rampal copper-plate. Mitra questions the restoration of "Rohitagiri" in verse 2, arguing that the original inscription lacks the final letter, which was supplied by R.G. Basak. He disputes the metrical accuracy of the proposed reading, suggesting the restoration is uncertain. However, counter-evidence from Orissan inscriptions—such as those of Jagattunga and Vinitatunga—supports "Rohitagiri" (variantly spelled *Rokitagiri* or *Rokitagiri*) as the correct form, derived from prose passages and reinforcing its validity. While the identification of Rohitagiri with Rohtasgadh remains unproven, Mitra concedes the restoration is plausible. The discussion underscores the tentative nature of historical linguistic reconstructions. In a separate note, Louis de La Vallée-Poussin addresses etymological debates about the term *Lokīyā*, correcting errors in the *Bibliotheca Buddhica* edition and defending his translation against criticisms by Vidhusekhara Bhattacharya, citing Pali, Sanskrit sources, and Wogihara’s scholarship.
AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.
Conclusion
The Rampal Copper-plate analysis underscores the significance of Rohitagiri as a historical site linked to the Candras and Orissan dynasties, challenging earlier scholarly doubts about the name's authenticity. By identifying parallel inscriptions from Orissa, the study validates the "Rohitagiri" reading, suggesting a broader regional connection between Eastern Bengal and Orissa. While the exact location remains unverified, the evidence strengthens the plausible identification with Rohtasgadh. This conclusion highlights the importance of cross-referencing epigraphic sources to resolve textual uncertainties and emphasizes the plate's role in tracing dynastic migrations and linguistic evolution, contributing to a more nuanced understanding of early medieval South Asian history.