Skip to content
Browse articles

Multiplication of Jatakas

By B. M. Barua

Vol. 2 · No. 3September - 1926pp. 623–625English

Summary

The Barhut Jataka-scenes provide evidence of an early collection of Birth-stories, referenced in the Culla-Niddesa as the *paṭicā Jātaka-satini* (500 stories). These stories differ from the Sutta-Pitaka’s canonical Jataka collection, aligning more closely with the later *Jātakatthavannani* (547 Jatakas), a 6th-century A.D. commentary that falls short of the traditional total of 550. The number of Jatakas expanded from 500 to 550 through processes like repetition of stories under different titles (e.g., Kapota and Kaka), slight narrative variations (e.g., Kharadiya and Tipallattha), changes in personnel (e.g., Rucira and Kapota), and manipulation of themes (e.g., Sujata and Mattakundali). Some stories, like the Kurudhamma and Vessantara, share common plots but differ in execution. Separation of subplots from larger narratives (e.g., Kandari from Kunala) also contributed to the multiplication. The Barhut scenes reflect early versions of stories, such as the *Isisipiya-Jataka*, which omits key elements like the temptations of the Bodhisatta by a heavenly courtesan and an earthly princess, present in later works like the *Jataka-Commentary* and *Mahiṃsā*. Similarly, the *Kinnara* scene’s label suggests it was once an independent Jataka later absorbed into the *Takkariya-Jataka*. These discrepancies highlight how stories evolved over time, with earlier forms serving as foundations for later

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

This analysis of Jataka multiplication reveals a dynamic textual evolution from an original 500 stories to a later standardized 550, demonstrating processes like repetition, adaptation, and narrative splitting. The Barhut Jataka-scenes provide critical evidence of early story versions, often diverging from canonical and commentary traditions. These findings highlight the fluid nature of Buddhist narrative traditions, where stories were modified, merged, or divided over time, reflecting both oral transmission influences and deliberate editorial efforts. The study underscores the complexity of Jataka scholarship, revealing how artistic representations and textual variations interact to preserve and transform Buddhist teachings across centuries.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The stories presupposed by the carvings differ in details from those in the Sutta-Pitaka collection, and approach those in फिट Jataka-Commentary, compiled in the ૬૫0 century A.D, if not later.”
  • “The Barhut scene with the label Kadari-£:% leaves one in the dark as to the actual position of the story in the Jataka coilection, then known”

Works cited in this article

  1. Culla-Niddesa, p. 80
  2. Cunningham's Stéipa of Bharhut, 21. xxv. 7
  3. Ibid, Pl जात, 2
  4. Ibid, Pl xxviL 12
  5. Jataka-Commentary

Discussed in this article

Places

Texts & works

  • Culla-Niddesa
  • Jataka Commentary
  • Suttapitaka 7
  • Ramaiyanic
  • Mahajanaka-Jataka
  • Mahiummagga-Jataka
  • Jatakatthavannani
  • Jitakafthakatha

Dynasties, sects & groups

  • Bodhisatta

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by B. M. Barua

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Obituary Notices (Mrs.C. A. F. Rhys Davids)

By B. M. Barua

December - 1943
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Hathigumpha Inscription of Kharavela

By B. M. Barua

September - 1938
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Minor Brahmi Inscriptions in the Udayagiri and Khandagiri Caves

By B. M. Barua

March - 1938
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Reviews

By B. M. Barua, Sushil Kumar De, U. N. Ghoshal, P. C. Bagchi

June - 1937