Skip to content
Browse articles

The Jainas and the Practice of Sati

By Sushil Saha

Vol. 12 · No. 4April - 1978pp. 136–138English

Summary

In this article the author explores the relationship between Jain communities and the practice of **sati**, the immolation of a widow on her husband’s funeral pyre. The piece first explains that sati has been portrayed in Hindu contexts as an act of devotion but that, historically, it was often coerced and served to deprive widows of property and autonomy. The article recounts how missionaries and social reformers like William Carey and Raja Ram Mohan Roy campaigned against sati, leading the British East India Company to outlaw it through the Bengal Sati Regulation of 1829. Despite this prohibition, isolated instances persisted into modern times, prompting the Indian Parliament to pass the Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act in 1987 to criminalise and prevent any glorification of the practice. Turning to Jainism, the author notes that Jain doctrine, with its emphasis on **ahimsa** (non‑violence) and the sanctity of all life, fundamentally opposes self‑immolation. There is no endorsement of sati in Jain scriptures, and the lives of Jain tirthankaras and ascetics emphasise renunciation rather than self‑sacrifice. Nevertheless, the article acknowledges that in regions where Jains lived alongside Hindus, social pressure sometimes led to rare instances of Jain widows performing sati to preserve family honour or property. By analysing inscriptions and legal records, the author argues that these cases were exceptional and not condoned by Jain authorities. He highlights efforts by modern Jain leaders to educate communities, support widow remarriage and advocate against harmful customs. The article concludes with a call for vigilance to ensure that social practices do not override ethical principles.

Summary reviewed by a volunteer editor.

Conclusion

The article concludes that sati is incompatible with Jain ethics. Although the custom persisted in some Hindu communities until banned by law, Jainism’s commitment to non‑violence means there is no justification for self‑immolation. The few historical instances of Jain widows performing sati were anomalies influenced by broader social pressures rather than reflections of doctrine. By highlighting legal reforms and modern advocacy, the author urges the community to promote education and equality for women and to resist customs that undermine the value of life.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The Jainas preached that the practice of Sati was but a sort of suicide committed out of dark ignorance.”
  • “According to Devanna Bhatta, a great Jaina scholar who flourished in south India in the 12th century, the custom of Sati is a corruption of religion and should be condemned and discouraged.”
  • “The Jaina philosophy brought a message of hope to many of the helpless widows who, instead of sacrificing themselves in the fire, engaged in the services of god and society.”

Works cited in this article

  1. The Wonder that was India, A. L. Basham, p. 187.
  2. An Advanced History of India, p. 822.
  3. Bikaner Jaina Lekh Sangrah, editor Agarchand Nahta & Bhanwarlal Nahta, p. 65.
  4. Anandaghana-pada-sangraha, p. 158.
  5. Vyavaharakanda, p. 598.

Discussed in this article

People

  • Bana 50
  • Akbar 85
  • Jugapradhan Dada Saheb Jinadatta Suri
  • Devanna Bhatta
  • Devi of the Jiigna Pancami
  • Karpura Devi
  • Prithviraj III
  • Purnapal
  • Lohini
  • Bigraharaj
  • Mayamalladevi
  • Siddharaj Jayasimha
  • Nayika

Dynasties, sects & groups

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.