Skip to content
Browse articles

Penology and Jaina Scriptures

By Ramesh C. Lalen

Vol. XV · No. 2Oct - 1980pp. 62–70English

Summary

In this article the author examines the field of penology—the science of punishment—and compares its principles with teachings from Jain scriptures. Modern societies seek a crime‑free environment but continue to witness wrongdoing despite extensive penal codes. Penology originally focused on defining punishment and later expanded to include treatment, correction, rehabilitation and the resocialisation of offenders. The article notes that standard textbooks often lack clear definitions and that penology now encompasses management of prisons and the wider correctional apparatus. Contrasting this with Jainism, the author emphasises that Jain teachings promote non‑violence, moral discipline and self‑restraint instead of punitive measures. Crime is viewed as arising from passions and ignorance; thus reform comes through education, vows, penance and spiritual practices rather than retribution. The article highlights concepts like ahimsa (non‑violence), anekantavada (non‑absolutism) and aparigraha (non‑attachment) as foundations for a humane justice system. It argues that adopting Jain principles could shift penal policies from punishment toward rehabilitation and social harmony. By aligning penology with the ethical insights of Jain scriptures, the article suggests a more compassionate and effective approach to addressing crime and promoting a just society.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

The article concludes that mainstream penology, with its emphasis on deterrence and retribution, could benefit from the compassionate perspective offered by Jainism. Jain scriptures advocate non‑violence, moral self‑discipline and the transformation of character rather than punishment. Integrating these principles into penal systems may foster rehabilitation, reduce recidivism and promote social harmony. Ultimately, the Jain approach views the true battle against crime as an internal fight against one’s own karmic tendencies, underscoring that ethical transformation is the path to a crime‑free society.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “Penology starts with the definition of punishment and ends ironically with a plea for total abolition of punishment, suggesting a substitute therapy of treatment, correction, reformation, rehabilitation and resocialization of the so-called ‘criminal’, ‘delinquent’, ‘deviant who cannot conform to the social norms’ and ‘client for the correctional apparatus’.”
  • “Penology, so defined, can safely avoid the conflict and controversy with the sociological theorists who visualize crime not as “an inherent property of an act’’ but as mere deviance not conforming to the social norms.”

Works cited in this article

  1. The New Criminology : for a Social Theory of Deviance, 1973, London, p. 281.
  2. Crime and Penal System, 1962, London, p. 1
  3. Criminology, 1956, New York. p. 1.
  4. Old Times Punishments, 1971, London, See contents.
  5. Criminology: A Cross Cultural Perspective, Vol IL, p. 553

Discussed in this article

People

  • Lord Arihanta
  • P. K. Goswami
  • N. L. Untwalia
  • D. Bhuvan Mohan Patnaik
  • Chandra Chuda
  • Lord Mahavira 120

Texts & works

Dynasties, sects & groups

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Continue reading

Related articles

Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

The Indian Sect of the Jainas

By George Buehler

April 1974