Skip to content
Browse articles

Jainism: Religious Practice and Festivals in Vijayanagara Empire

By Jagadeesh Kivudanavar

Vol. 36 · No. No. 2October - 2001pp. 66–70English

Summary

Jagadeesh G. Kivudanavar surveys the role of Jainism in the Vijayanagara Empire of South India. Although the empire was primarily Hindu, the Jains enjoyed royal patronage and played a significant role in its cultural life. The article discusses daily religious practices such as worship of Tirthankaras, recitation of hymns, performance of sāmāyika (meditative ritual), and observance of vows. It describes major festivals like Mahamastakabhisheka (grand head‑anointing ceremony) at Shravanabelagola and other annual celebrations honouring Lord Bahubali and Lord Mahavira. The author notes that Jain temples and basadis were built in Vijayanagara style, with intricate carvings and monolithic statuesimage/. The article also records the decline of Jainism after the fall of the empire, when patronage shifted and many Jains migrated. However, the influence of Jain values such as ahimsa and anekantavada endured in local culture. By analysing inscriptions and literature, the author shows that Jains contributed to education, architecture and administration, and that Jain festivals coexisted harmoniously with Hindu and Muslim observancesimage/.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

Jainism flourished under Vijayanagara kings, leaving behind temples, sculptures and festivals that testify to its presence. The article highlights the resilience of Jain religious practice even amid political changes and underscores how Jain ethical ideals blended into the region’s pluralistic culture.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The 14th and 15th centuries of Vijayanagara is called as the age of the ‘the religious toleration’.”
  • “He entrusted the Jainas to the care and protection of the Srivaishnavas and declared that there was no difference between the Vaishnava Dharma and the Jaina Dharma.”

Works cited in this article

  1. EC. Vol. II, Sb. 344.
  2. MER 1890, No. 41.
  3. S.LI. Vol. I, No. 152.
  4. MER 1901. No. 55.
  5. Ibid., 1935-36, No. 336.

Discussed in this article

People

Places

Dynasties, sects & groups

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.