Skip to content
Browse articles

Evolution of the Jaina Treatment of Ethical Problems

By Krishna Kumar Dixit

Vol. 2 · No. 1April 1973pp. 25–44English

Summary

I. Doctrinal and Sectarian Differences Three major sectarian issues: 1. Authenticity of Scriptures o Digambaras: Believe original Jain scriptures are entirely lost. o Svetambaras: Claim partial survival; try to preserve and interpret ancient texts. o Both agree that scriptural loss aligns with cosmic moral decline. 2. Monastic Nakedness o Digambaras: View complete nudity as essential for monks. o Svetambaras: Accept that Mahavira was naked, but say this practice ended after Jamba, citing societal decline. o Practical differences were minor as most monks wore clothes due to social constraints. 3. Idol Worship o Sthanakavasins (a subsect of Svetambaras): Oppose idol worship, claiming it's unsupported by early scriptures. o Their rise parallels similar anti-idolatry movements (e.g., Arya Samaj in Hinduism). o Despite initial resistance, idol worship became widely practiced among both major Jain sects. ________________________________________ II. Historical Development of Jain Ethical Thought From Umasvati’s Tattvarthasutra: • Jain philosophy includes seven or nine tattvas (truths): o Ontology: jiva (soul), ajiva (non-soul) o Ethics: asrava (influx of karma), bandha (bondage), samvara (stoppage), nirjara (purging), moksha (liberation) o Later additions: punya (good karma), papa (bad karma) Development of Karma Doctrine: • Early Jain texts (e.g., Acaranga, Sutrakritanga) lacked detailed karma theory. • The Bhagavati Sutra introduces karma as physical particles that bind to the soul. • Umasvati’s system later refined this into a full ethical framework (e.g., asrava, samvara, nirjara as ethical acts). Analogy Used: • Boat with holes: o Holes open = asrava (karma flows in) o Holes closed = samvara (karma blocked) o Water removal = nirjara (karma expelled) ________________________________________ III. Social Context and Ethical Practice Monastic vs. Householder Ethics: • Early Jainism saw only monks as true practitioners. • Gradually, householders were incorporated and given a parallel ethical path. Stages of Ethical Life: 1. Faith (śraddhā) 2. Partial discipline (for householders) 3. Total discipline (for monks) Duties of Jaina Householders: • Standardized into 12 items, including: o Five minor vows (non-violence, truth, non-stealing, celibacy, non-possessiveness) o Seven supplementary vows, e.g.,:  Limiting consumption  Avoiding unnecessary harm  Hospitality to monks  Occasional fasting (Pausadha)  Mental detachment rituals (Samayika) Cultic vs. Ethical Practice: • Early Jainism focused on ethics, not rituals. • Later texts introduced rituals like: o Avasyaka (six-step daily rite) o Samayika (mental calm) and Pausadha (day of renunciation) Shift in Monastic Role: • Originally: monks denounced social inequities. • Later: became institutionalized, managing temples and leading idol worship. • Sectarian disputes (e.g., Digambara vs. Svetambara) focused on minor ritual or lifestyle differences, missing the original social-moral core.

Summary reviewed by a volunteer editor.

Conclusion

The text highlights the doctrinal and sectarian differences within Jainism, particularly around issues such as scriptural authenticity, monastic nakedness, and idol worship. Over time, Jain ethical thought evolved, with significant contributions from Umasvati’s Tattvarthasutra and the refinement of karma doctrine. The transformation from monastic to householder ethics reflects Jainism’s evolving inclusiveness. Despite sectarian conflicts, Jainism’s ethical framework remains focused on self-discipline, mental purity, and spiritual liberation, while the practical aspects of worship and ritual became more institutionalized.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The inner-community differences of the modern Jainas are chiefly centred around three questions, viz.”
  • “Thus it must have been the absence in those texts of an exposition of the classical Jaina positions on important theoretical questions that created in the mind of the latter-day Digambaras a misgiving as to the authenticity of these texts, a misgiving that in due course culminated in an actual repudiation of their authenticity.”
  • “The difference is explained by the difference of social conditions under which the two set of texts were composed.”

Discussed in this article

Texts & works

Dynasties, sects & groups

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Krishna Kumar Dixit

All articles →
Sambodhi

A New Contribution to the Discussion of a Problem of Jaina Monastic Discipline

By Krishna Kumar Dixit

July-October 1976
Sambodhi

नवीन उपनिषदों की दार्शनिक चर्चा (navin upnishodki darshnik charcha)

By Krishna Kumar Dixit

april 1974
Sambodhi

प्राचीन उपनिषदों की दार्शनिक चर्चा

By Krishna Kumar Dixit

October 1973
Sambodhi

The Problems of Ethics and Karma Doctrine as treated in the Bhagvati Sutra

By Krishna Kumar Dixit

October 1973