Skip to content
Browse articles

Jaina Theory and Practice of Non-violence

By Dalsukh D. Malvania

Vol. 2 · No. 1April 1973pp. 3–8English

Summary

1. Vedic Tradition and Ahimsa The early Vedic tradition did not focus on the theory or practice of ahimsa (non-violence). The term ahimsa is not found in the Vedas or Brahmanas but appears first in the Upanishads. Vedic religion was based on sacrifices that often required animal killing. Even the Smritis permitted serving animal meat, including beef, to guests. Hence, the concept and practice of ahimsa are not Vedic in origin but came from Jainism, Buddhism, and other Śramaṇa traditions. 2. Jainism's Contribution to Ahimsa Mahavira was the first to teach and practice non-violence toward all living beings (moving and non-moving), recognizing that all life resists harm. He shaped his life to avoid harming any being deliberately. He taught: “All beings are fond of life, like pleasure, hate pain, shun destruction.” The Acaranga Sutra emphasized universal non-violence as an eternal, unchanging law. 3. The Jaina View on Sin and Violence Jainism distinguished between mere killing and the intention behind it. Violence (ahimsa) was defined as harming with careless or passionate intention (pramada). Even unavoidable killing (e.g., when walking) was not sinful if done carefully and without harmful intent. Jaina texts prescribed mindful, careful behaviour in all actions to minimize harm. 4. Ethical Practices of Jain Monks Monks were instructed to eat, speak, walk, sit, and lie down careafully to avoid harming life. Mahavira himself lived extremely austerely, refusing any food or shelter involving harm to any being. He rejected meat, fish, and alcohol entirely. The goal was to limit violence even in unavoidable contexts and cultivate compassion. 5. Philosophical Interpretations Jain philosophers argued that true violence lies in the intention to harm, not merely in the physical act. A doctor may cause pain but is non-violent if the intent is pure. Jainism developed a detailed karma theory to show the consequences of violence and passion. 6. Jainism’s Impact on Indian Society Jain canonical stories warn that participating in war leads to rebirth in hell unless one repents and renounces violence. Jain monks took vows of complete non-violence, truthfulness, celibacy, non-stealing, and non-possession. Mahavira practiced total renunciation, even of clothing, to avoid possessiveness. Household Jainas were advised to limit possessions and avoid violent occupations. This emphasis on non-violence led to the strong vegetarian tradition among Jains and influenced broader Hindu society to value vegetarianism. 7. Broader Religious Influence Before Mahavira and the Buddha, satya (truth) was the main virtue in Vedic religion. After their teachings, both satya and ahimsa became central to Indian religious thought, including the Epics and Puranas. The text concludes that the prominence of ahimsa in Indian religion owes much to Jainism and Buddhism.

Summary reviewed by a volunteer editor.

Conclusion

The concept of ahimsa (non-violence), although not initially part of the Vedic tradition, was powerfully integrated into Indian philosophy through Jainism. Mahavira’s teachings on universal non-violence shaped not only Jain practices but also influenced broader Indian religious thought, including Hinduism, Buddhism, and the Epics. Jainism’s focus on intention behind actions and the ethical practices of monks further solidified ahimsa as a core principle, impacting social norms, vegetarianism, and the avoidance of violence in daily life.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “Even the word ahiihsu is not found in the Vedas and the Brahmanas; it is found, for the first time, in the Upanisad (Cog. 3.17.4)”
  • “The ideas AMmsn and the unity of all life did not have their origin in Vedic Aryan thought, but entered it from outside. The environment in which those ideas were at home was that of Jainism and Buddhism.”
  • “Lord Mahavira seems to be the first person who was convinced that not only the mankind but all the moving and non-moving living beings should be protected and should not be harmed because he was convinced that each of them, just like any human being, does not want any harm to be done to it.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Brown W. Norman : Man in the Univent ; Calcutta, Pub, Oxford and I BH publishing company, 1966 ; p. 54.
  2. Brown W. Norman : Man in the Universe, p, 6$.
  3. SBE Vol. XXII, p. 19.
  4. SBE. Vol. XXII, p. 39; ^SrSaga 1.4.2 : "q^aj tf&&tfl \ 5 ^ qRI3W, ft ^
  5. Schubring Dasaveynliya 6, (7-9.).

Discussed in this article

People

Texts & works

Dynasties, sects & groups

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Dalsukh D. Malvania

All articles →
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Well‑wishes

By Dalsukh D. Malvania

July - 1991
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

The Story of Bharata and Bahubali (Part 1)

By Dalsukh D. Malvania

April - 1981
Sambodhi

The Story of Bharata and Bahubali

By Dalsukh D. Malvania

October 1977 - January 1978
Sambodhi

શૂન્યવાદ

By Dalsukh D. Malvania

1976