Skip to content
Browse articles

Clive and the Company's Fire-Arms

By Nandlal Chatterji

Vol. 28 · No. 3September - 1952pp. 293–294English

Summary

Focusing on military supply, this article reveals that the East India Company’s troops were equipped with poor‑quality fire‑arms during Clive’s tenure. Arms procured from unapproved suppliers were badly produced and ill‑finished; the metal was not properly tempered for India’s climate, leading to frequent breakdowns. Clive proposed several remedies: purchasing weapons from government‑approved manufacturers, paying higher prices for better workmanship, sending skilled iron‑founders to India and ordering a large initial supply followed by annual consignments. Despite these sensible suggestions, the Company directors refused to invest more money, and the quality of arms remained substandard. The article uses this case to illustrate the penny‑pinching attitudes and logistical problems that plagued early British military operations in India.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

The article concludes that the East India Company’s reluctance to spend adequately on equipment jeopardised its troops’ effectiveness. Clive’s recommendations for quality control were ignored, exemplifying how short‑sighted cost‑saving measures undermined colonial military preparedness and reflecting broader systemic issues in the Company’s administration.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “While examining the original records relating to Clive’s second Governorship of Fort William, the writer of this paper came across some very interesting and hitherto unnoticed references ૬૦ the extremely poor quality of both small arms and cannon which wer= usually supplied to the Company’s troops 10 India during those days.”
  • “From the stray referer-es in the records it would appear that the fire-arms supplied. from England had usually ૬૪૪૦ defects.”
  • “It appears that the Directors took no serious notice of Clive’s repres:ntations on this point, and the troops never received adequate supplics of arms of the requisite quality, (Letter to Court, April 10, 1767).”

Works cited in this article

  1. Letter to Court, April 10, 1767
  2. Letter ૬૦ Court, March 28, 1768

Discussed in this article

People

Texts & works

  • Clive and the Company's Fire-Arms

Dynasties, sects & groups

  • Company 3
  • Government of England
  • Council of Fort William

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Nandlal Chatterji

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Clive and the Company's Gumastahs

By Nandlal Chatterji

September - 1952
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Some Anglo‑French Disputes in Bengal during post‑diwany Period

By Nandlal Chatterji

September - 1941
The Indian Historical Quarterly

A forgotten treaty between Shujauddaulah and the English

By Nandlal Chatterji

September - 1940
The Indian Historical Quarterly

A Forgotten Conspiracy against the English in Bengal

By Nandlal Chatterji

March - 1937