Skip to content
Browse articles

Chitor and Ala‑ud‑din Khalji

By M. L. Mathur

Vol. 27 · No. 1March 1951pp. 52–69English

Summary

This historical narrative recounts the siege of Chitor (Chittor) in 1303 by Sultan Ala‑ud‑din Khalji of Delhi. After the death of Rawal Samar Singh, his son Ratan Singh ruled Mewar from the formidable fortress of Chitor, a symbol of Rajput pride. The article recounts the famous legend of Padmini, Ratan Singh’s beautiful queen. According to tradition, Ala‑ud‑din demanded to see her and, after being allowed only a reflected glimpse, treacherously captured Ratan Singh and insisted on Padmini’s surrender as ransom. The Rajput heroes Gora and Badal led a daring rescue and smuggled Ratan Singh out of captivity. The story culminates in Ala‑ud‑din’s siege and sack of Chitor, where the defenders fought fiercely but were ultimately overwhelmed. The article stresses that while the Padmini story has become central to Rajput folklore, modern historians doubt its historicity, noting the absence of contemporary evidence. Nevertheless, the siege was a significant event in the struggle between Rajput states and the Delhi Sultanate. By combining traditional accounts with critical historiography, the article illuminates both the military strategies employed by Ala‑ud‑din and the enduring power of legend in shaping historical memory.

Summary reviewed by a volunteer editor.

Conclusion

The fall of Chitor to Ala‑ud‑din Khalji marked a watershed in Rajput–Delhi relations. Although the romantic tale of Padmini adds dramatic colour, contemporary records do not substantiate it. Recognising the divergence between legend and history allows a more nuanced understanding of this conflict and demonstrates how folklore can influence perceptions of historical events.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “On Rawal Samar Singh’s death in 1302 A.D., his son Ratan Singh became che ruler of Mewar chen regarded as the premier state of Rajputana.”
  • “None of the Rajput and Muhammadan writers of the 14th and 15th centuries refer to Padmini and Sultan’s lust for her or to Raja’s trea-cherous arrest and fescue by that ‘horse of Troy’ type device.”
  • “It is for this reason most probably that all the Persian works!” composed prior to Jayasi are quite silent about the whole of the Padmini affair and attach no other motives but political to this expedition of the Sultan on Chitor.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Kumbbalgarb Prasasti
  2. Dewal Rani
  3. Tarikh-i-Alai
  4. Khazain-ul-Futuh
  5. Vir Vinod

Discussed in this article

People

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by M. L. Mathur

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Early Rulers of Mewar and their Fights with the Arabs

By M. L. Mathur

March - 1954
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Early Rulers of Mewar and their Fights with the Arabs

By M. L. Mathur

December - 1953
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Origin of the Guhilots: were they Nagar Brahmans?

By M. L. Mathur

December - 1950
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Rastrakutas of Kanyakubja and their Migration to Marwar

By M. L. Mathur

June - 1944