Skip to content
Browse articles

A few leaves from the history of Singhbhum: A hundred years ago

By P. R. Sen

Vol. 27 · No. 1March 1951pp. 70–75English

Summary

This miscellany uses archival correspondence to sketch the history of Singhbhum, a district in present‑day Jharkhand, during the early 19th century and the 1850s. Chaibassa, the district headquarters, remained a sleepy settlement even as industry developed nearby. Letters from 1858 describe the British Government’s attachment of the Porahat estate and its policy of non‑interference in local administration, provided chiefs such as the Raja of Porahat and the Koar of Seraikella supplied fugitives and maintained order. Earlier records (1818–1836) reveal that Singhbhum was rarely under Mughal or Maratha control and served as a refuge for those fleeing other regions. The British administration used punitive expeditions to enforce loyalty and, over time, encouraged the establishment of village panchayats and schools to integrate the area into colonial governance. The article underscores how local chiefs navigated their relationships with the East India Company, balancing autonomy with submission. It also highlights how colonial policies evolved from punitive raids to strategies aimed at gradually incorporating Singhbhum into the colonial state while reshaping its socio‑political landscape. By bringing together disparate archival voices, the article offers glimpses into the everyday dynamics of a frontier district negotiating its place under early British rule.

Summary reviewed by a volunteer editor.

Conclusion

The history of Singhbhum illustrates the delicate balance between local autonomy and colonial control. British authorities alternated between coercion and accommodation, using military force to ensure loyalty while fostering panchayats and education as tools of integration. Understanding this microhistory sheds light on the wider processes of state formation in 19th‑century India.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • ““‘Singbhum would never appear to hhave been brought under subjection during the Mussalman ru'e in Hindestan, and the Mahrattas neither took possession of, nor collected Chaut from, it.””
  • “The political, and educational environment of Chyebassa abour a hundred years ago has been suggested in this brief paper, based on a few court records in Chaibassa.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Judicial nc. 256
  2. Judicial no. 1222
  3. Bengal Government record, Judicial Dept. no-12 (Criminal)
  4. Letter no. 4704 of 30th ultimo from the Secretary to the Government of Bengal
  5. Letter no. 60 of 1858

Discussed in this article

People

  • Major Roughsedge
  • T. Wilkinson
  • E. G. Lushington
  • Madho Singh
  • Raja Gunsham Singh
  • Bickram Singh
  • Chyetun Singh

Places

Dynasties, sects & groups

  • Cole and Sonthal Levy

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.