Skip to content
Browse articles

The Vaisyas in Mediaeval Bengal

By N. K. Dutt

Vol. 16 · No. 4December - 1940pp. 689–710English

Summary

This study examines the decline of the Vaisya varna in mediaeval Bengal. The Vaisya, traditionally associated with agriculture, trade, cattle‑rearing and money‑lending, gradually lost their status as those occupations came to be performed by the artisan castes and were classified as Shudra. Medieval lawgivers often omitted the Vaisya entirely, recognising only Brahmana and Shudra in Kali Yuga. The article shows how Bengal’s religious and social history—dominated for centuries by Buddhism, Jainism and Tantric cults and only later drawn into Brahmanical orthodoxy—prevented the varnasrama system from taking deep root. The Muslim conquest further weakened caste boundaries and empowered agricultural and artisan communities. By tracing references in Sanskrit texts, inscriptions and regional literature, the author argues that the once‑respected Vaisya occupations were gradually stigmatised and absorbed by the Shudra category. The work thus illuminates how social hierarchies evolve and how local historical factors can reshape the Hindu varna system.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

The article concludes that in mediaeval Bengal the Vaisya caste effectively disappeared as a distinct social group. The artisan and peasant classes that once embodied Vaisya functions were redefined as Shudras, while Brahmin lawgivers and Muslim rulers alike showed little interest in maintaining the older four‑fold varna structure. This transformation underscores the flexibility of social categories and the need to study caste within its regional and historical contexts.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The Vaidya author Bharata-mallika writing in the latter half of the seventeenth century quotes this dictum in his Candraprabbi to indicate the Sidra status of his own caste, and a similar dictum is referred to by the contemporary writer, Kamalikarabhatta, who was a Deccan Brahmana settled at Benares.”
  • “The latter, however, observes that the Ksatriyas and Vaisyas have not been extirpated, but that they remain unnoticed because of their non-observance of sacred rites.”
  • “Buddhimanta Khin of Navadvip, Kedara Raya of Vikrampur, Pratapaditya of Jessore, Rammcandra of Chandradvip, Laksmana-manikya of Bhulua were all Kayasthas in the sixteenth century and had ceased to be regarded as ewice-born.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Candraprabbi
  2. Vratyetd-préyaicitte-nirneys
  3. Mitaksaré
  4. Caturvargacintamani
  5. Suddbicintamani

Discussed in this article

People

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.