Skip to content
Browse articles

English Missions to Mir Jumla

By Jagadish Narayan Sarkar

Vol. 16 · No. 4December - 1940pp. 773–782English
East India Company

Summary

Mir Jumla's conquest of the Carnatic in 1647 significantly influenced his relations with the English, who initially viewed him as a potential overlord but sought his favor due to his strategic importance. Despite his hostile stance toward the Dutch—stemming from their monopolistic trade practices, perceived arrogance, and interference in his commercial interests—Mir Jumla maintained a friendly disposition toward the English, confirming their existing privileges under the Golkonda sovereign. His displeasure with the Dutch led him to establish monopolies in unbleached cloth and seek commercial agreements with the English East India Company (EIC), proposing profit-sharing from Persian and other trade ventures. The English, recognizing Mir Jumla's leverage over the Dutch, sought to secure his cooperation. In September 1650, they sent a mission led by Venkata Brahman, offering gifts and proposing closer collaboration. Mir Jumla responded positively, expressing interest in joining the EIC's stock and sharing profits from coastal trade. He emphasized that such an alliance would benefit both parties, with the English potentially gaining exclusive trade rights in his territories. While the English were cautious about the implications of his monopolistic schemes, they viewed his propositions favorably, particularly given the Dutch's diminished influence. This interaction highlighted Mir Jumla's strategic acumen and the competitive dynamics between European powers in the region.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

The English missions to Mir Jumla during 1650-52 revealed the complex interplay of political and commercial interests shaping early East India Company diplomacy. Mir Jumla's Carnatic conquest forced the English to recalibrate their strategy, transitioning from rivals to pragmatic allies seeking his favor. His hostility toward the Dutch, rooted in perceived arrogance and trade monopolization, created opportunities for the English to position themselves as alternative trading partners. While Mir Jumla pursued aggressive commercial monopolies, the English navigated these ambitions cautiously, balancing their own trade interests with the Nawab's territorial expansion. These interactions underscored the fluid nature of 17th-century South Indian politics, where shifting alliances and economic agendas defined the dynamics between regional powers and European traders. The English ultimately prioritized strategic accommodations to secure their commercial position, reflecting the adaptive realities of colonial engagement in the Carnatic region.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The conquest of the Carnatic was a turning point in the career of Mir Jumla and 16 profoundly influenced his relations with the English.”
  • “The English, on their part, wanted to secure the co-operation of the Nawab, પ taking advantage of his displeasure with their rivals, the Dutch.””
  • “The Nawab represented to घाट English that by joining him they would profit immensely, they might even ‘enjoy the whole trade,” 1.૯. just as घाट Nawab would monopolise and control घाट marketing organisation (1.૯. production, sale, and price) and be the sole stockist and agent,”

Works cited in this article

  1. Proceedings of the Third Session of the Indian History Congress, December, 1939
  2. FEF, 1651-54, p. 13
  3. Vide the Report of Litdeton & Venkata Brahman, January, 17, 1651
  4. Hobson-Jobson SV., Quedda 567-8
  5. Ibid., SV., Achcen, p. 3

Discussed in this article

People

  • Mir Jumla 5
  • Venkata Brahman
  • Walter Littleton
  • Agent Greenhill
  • President Baker

Dynasties, sects & groups

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Jagadish Narayan Sarkar

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Silk Trade of Patna in Early Seventeenth Century

By Jagadish Narayan Sarkar

June - 1939
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Cotton Trade of Patna in early Seventeenth Century

By Jagadish Narayan Sarkar

December - 1936
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Reviews

By Ananda Kentish Coomaraswamy, Satkari Mookherjree, Mano Mohan Ghosh, Benoy Kumar Sarkar, U. N. Ghoshal, Dhirendra Chandra Ganguly, Chintaharan Chakravarti, Batakrishna Ghosh, Vidhushekhara Bhattacharya, Jagadish Narayan Sarkar

June - 1935

Continue reading

Related articles

The Indian Historical Quarterly

Siraj‑ud‑daulah and the English before 1756

By Kali Kinkar Datta

Jun-46
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Private Commercial Dealings of the Servants of the East India Company from 1757-1767

By Dhan Keswani

June & September 1960
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Bombay and English Constitutional Law

By Arthur Berriedale Keith

March - 1935
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Dispute between Court Cutcherry and Mayor’s Court, Calcutta

By Tarit K. Mukherji

March 1951
Journal of Indian History and Culture

St. Mary’s Church: A Contextual Study of Madras’ Oldest British Structure

By Roshini Roy

December 2022
Journal of Indian History and Culture

English Private Trade and Territorial Expansion in Seventeenth-Century East Coast India

By Jyoti Phulera

June 2022