Skip to content
Browse articles

Private Commercial Dealings of the Servants of the East India Company from 1757-1767

By Dhan Keswani

Vol. 36 · No. 2 & 3June & September 1960pp. 128–140English
East India Company

Summary

This article examines how servants of the English East India Company amassed fortunes through private trade between 1757 and 1767. After the conquest of Bengal, company officials exploited their power to monopolise salt, betel‑nut and other commodities, using dastaks (trade passes) to avoid customs. They compelled local merchants to sell goods at low prices and transported goods under company flags. The Court of Directors repeatedly admonished them but struggled to enforce its orders. The article details the scale of these illicit dealings and shows how they damaged Bengal’s economy and alienated Indian merchants. Reforms eventually introduced regulations to curb private trading and by 1775 such monopolies were abolished. The author argues that the greed of company servants undermined the East India Company’s legitimacy and contributed to calls for greater regulation and, ultimately, Crown control.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

By exposing how company servants abused their privileges for personal gain, the article illuminates one of the systemic abuses that precipitated later regulatory reforms. The abolition of private trade in the 1770s marked an important step toward ending mercantile exploitation and paved the way for more direct imperial governance.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “Ten years of good government is a period "too short, cen years of misrule is a period agonisingly long.”
  • “The first sanad granting the privilege of dastak to the Com- pany to cover all goods whether imported or purchased in the country for export was accorded by Aurangzeb in 1667.”
  • “Bengal presented a curious picture of Swbab unarmed, with a revenue of almost two million sterling at the mercy of the servants" who adopted unheard of practices to enrich them- selves while ruining the Company.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Aitchison, Treaties, Engagements and Sunnuds, vol. VI, p. 222.
  2. D, N, Banerjee, Early Administrative System of the East India Company in Bengal, vol. I, Appendix pp, 654-50.
  3. Mansittart,{Henry,| 4 Narrative of the Transactions in Bengal, vol. III, pp. 13-14, 185 ef seq.
  4. Fourth Report, Appendix 52; also Select Committee Proceedings, 3 September 1766
  5. Fourth Report, No. 52, article 10,

Discussed in this article

Texts & works

  • Society of Trade
  • Second Plan

Dynasties, sects & groups

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Continue reading

Related articles

Journal of Indian History and Culture

Weavers' Settlements and Colonial Trade in 17th-18th Century Madras

By J. Sumathi

June 2022
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Silk Trade of Patna in Early Seventeenth Century

By Jagadish Narayan Sarkar

June - 1939
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Siraj‑ud‑daulah and the English before 1756

By Kali Kinkar Datta

Jun-46
Journal of Indian History and Culture

British Imperialism and East India Company's Conquest of India

By Rukmini Nagarajan

September 2005
Journal of Indian History and Culture

English Private Trade and Territorial Expansion in Seventeenth-Century East Coast India

By Jyoti Phulera

June 2022
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Bombay and English Constitutional Law

By Arthur Berriedale Keith

March - 1935