Skip to content
Browse articles

Huvishka as Mahāsena

By Harit Krishna Deb

Vol. 12 · No. 1March - 1936pp. 153–156English

Summary

This essay investigates why the Kushan king Huvishka is referred to in some inscriptions as Mahāsena, a title traditionally associated with the war‑god Skanda/Kārtikeya. It compares Huvishka’s use of the epithet with earlier rulers and explores its meaning. Drawing on a Brāhmī inscription from Mathurā, the author analyses a passage that reads ‘sarvatatva‑mahārāja’, noting that the language of the record blends Prakrit with Sanskrit. By breaking down the compound sarva‑tatva, he argues that it derives from the Sanskrit sat‑tva‑tva, meaning ‘existing’ or ‘living’, and thus conveys the sense of ‘existing in all essences’. The article links this expression to the epithet Mahāsena, suggesting that Huvishka sought to identify himself with Skanda, who was born among reeds and known for his martial prowess. Additional evidence comes from a Kharoṣṭhī inscription from Peshawar, where Huvishka is called Mahāsena in connection with a casket containing relics of the Buddha. The author discusses how the adoption of the title reflects the syncretic religious environment of the Kushan empire, where rulers embraced Buddhist, Śaiva and local cults. The article concludes that Huvishka’s epithet Mahāsena emphasised his role as a universal sovereign and patron of multiple faiths.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

By tracing the epigraphic evidence for Huvishka’s use of the title Mahāsena, the article demonstrates how Kushan kings appropriated divine epithets to bolster their legitimacy. The association with Skanda underscores the blending of martial and religious symbolism, revealing the eclectic character of Kushan kingship.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “It seems likely that Huviska દ affected the same or a similar style pertaining primarily to Karttikeya, the War-god.”
  • “Huvigka, being a son of Vima, deemed it fit to adopt = style belonging. to the divine son. of the deity whose epithet his father had assumed.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Cambridge Shorter History of India, pp. 76.7—8
  2. JRAS, 1924, p. 402

Discussed in this article

Places

Texts & works

  • Kusina Brahwi inscription

Dynasties, sects & groups

  • Kusina

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Harit Krishna Deb

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Kautiliya Arthasastra on Forms of Government

By Harit Krishna Deb

June - 1938
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Indo‑Greek Coin‑Types

By Harit Krishna Deb

September - 1934
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Ohind (Und) Inscription

By Harit Krishna Deb

September - 1933
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Scythian Tribal Names in a Mathura Epigraph

By Harit Krishna Deb

September - 1933

Continue reading

Related articles

The Indian Historical Quarterly

Side-Lights on the Later Kusanas

By Adris Banerji

March - 1937