Skip to content
Browse articles

Scythian Tribal Names in a Mathura Epigraph

By Harit Krishna Deb

Vol. 9 · No. 3September - 1933pp. 800–802English

Summary

This brief note analyses an Indo‑Scythian inscription from Mathura that preserves names of tribal groups associated with the Kushan empire. The author identifies terms such as Pasianoi, Saraucae and Asai as names of Scythian or Saka tribes known from Classical sources. He proposes that the donors mentioned in the inscription belonged to a mixed Pasianoi–Saraucae stock, suggesting ethnic amalgamation in the Mathura region. Cross‑referencing Ptolemy and Strabo, the note explores potential correlations between tribal names and geographic features, for example linking Barukamāṇa with the river Burganes and considering connections between Praci‑ntakaṇa and place‑names in the Kurram and Wakhan valleys. The author concludes that such epigraphic evidence, though scant, enriches our understanding of Central Asian groups who migrated into northern India and contributed to the cultural mosaic of the Kushan period. These inscriptions underscore the diversity of the region and the integration of foreign elites into local religious and social life.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

The note concludes that Scythian tribal names preserved in the Mathura inscription highlight the complex ethnic landscape of early first‑millennium India. Identifying these names with tribes mentioned in Greco‑Roman sources helps trace migration patterns and cultural interactions across Central and South Asia. The author calls for further interdisciplinary research combining epigraphy, classical literature and archaeology to map the movements of nomadic groups and their role in Indian history.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “I staied that our macription proves the use of Macedoulan moenth. napies in the Mathuru region at least ns ently ns the reign-of Huviska.”
  • “My own view 15 that the years belong to the 2nd century of the Vikramg era; the year 28 of our epigraph being equivalent 10 128 Vikrama”
  • “For such an explanation, fortunately, we are not withiout external data. Straho, in a well-known passage, eaumerates various 'Seythian' trihes—A siof, Pasianoi, Tokharoi, Sarnkauloi”

Works cited in this article

  1. FHQ., viii, pp. 117 ff.

Discussed in this article

People

Places

Texts & works

  • Pracinilana-Surukamana

Dynasties, sects & groups

  • Pasianoi
  • Asioi
  • Tokharoi

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Harit Krishna Deb

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Kautiliya Arthasastra on Forms of Government

By Harit Krishna Deb

June - 1938
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Huvishka as Mahāsena

By Harit Krishna Deb

March - 1936
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Indo‑Greek Coin‑Types

By Harit Krishna Deb

September - 1934
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Ohind (Und) Inscription

By Harit Krishna Deb

September - 1933

Continue reading

Related articles

The Indian Historical Quarterly

A Note on the Girdharpur Brahmi Inscription of the Year 28

By Sten Konow

March - 1933