Skip to content
Browse articles

The Dinajpur Pillar Inscription of the Kambojanvaya Gaudipati

By Jogendra Chandra Ghosh

Vol. 9 · No. 3September - 1933pp. 789–791English

Summary

This short paper revisits a three‑line inscription carved on the base of a pillar discovered in the ruins of Binad Binnagar near Dinajpur. Previously deciphered and translated by Westmacott and Rajendralal Mitra, the inscription was thought to commemorate a Kambojanvaya Gaudipati—an overlord of Gauda belonging to a Kamboja lineage. The author reproduces the Sanskrit text and discusses its translation, which praises a ruler whose ‘army destroyed the forces of formidable enemies’ and who granted a village to Brahmins. Through palaeographic analysis and examination of metre, the paper suggests a date around the 11th century CE, during the period when the Pala empire was declining and regional powers like the Sena dynasty were emerging. The discussion considers the identities of figures mentioned, examining whether the Gaudipati could be identified with Samantasena or with a local feudatory named Kuñjaraghatavarman. The author weighs arguments about whether the title ‘Gaudipati’ indicates sovereignty or subordinate status. By cross‑referencing historical chronicles and inscriptions from Bengal and Mithila, the paper concludes that the pillar record reflects a brief assertion of independence by a regional chief who was soon subdued by rising Sena power. Although the precise identification remains uncertain, the inscription is valuable for illustrating the fluid political landscape of north‑eastern India in the late first millennium.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

The article concludes that the Dinajpur pillar inscription adds an important data point for understanding the tumultuous period following the Pala decline. While the exact identity of the Kambojanvaya Gaudipati cannot be definitively established, the record confirms the presence of Kamboja‑linked rulers in Bengal and highlights the interplay between feudal lords and emerging dynasties. Continued discovery and analysis of such inscriptions will help unravel the complex genealogies and political claims of this era.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The reading and the translation are given below :— 1. Durevar-ari-varuthini-pramathane dane ૮૮ Vidyadharaih sinandam div”
  • “Dr. R. C. Majumdar, it seems, has taken the wiore reasonable view. He hoids that Kufijaraghati-varsa was (he 10303 of the franda. pati.”
  • “We ideutify this Kulijaraghail with the Kambejinveyaja Guuda-pati of the Dinajpur pillar inscription”

Works cited in this article

  1. I.H.Q., SEPTEMBER, 1004
  2. Deopara inscription of Vijaynsena
  3. Dr, Raichaudburi's Sfud, Ind. Antiq., p, 158

Discussed in this article

Places

Texts & works

  • Dinajpur Pillar Inscription of the Kambojanvaya Gaudipati

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Jogendra Chandra Ghosh

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Caste of the S'un'gas

By Jogendra Chandra Ghosh

December - 1939
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Khasarpana

By Jogendra Chandra Ghosh

December - 1939
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Gandeśvarācārya Jñānottama

By Jogendra Chandra Ghosh

Dec-37
The Indian Historical Quarterly

King Narasimha of Gaunda and the study of the Mahabhasya in Bengal

By Jogendra Chandra Ghosh

December - 1933