Skip to content
Browse articles

Jain Sahityaka Brhad Itihas (Review)

Vol. 4 · No. 1July 1969pp. 48–50English

Summary

This review discusses the third volume, *Agamic byakhyaen*, of Mohanlal Mehta’s encyclopaedic work *Jain Sahitya-ka Brhad Itihas*. The volume focuses on the auxiliary sacred literature of the Jainas, specifically the diverse Agamic interpretations categorized as niryuktis, bhasyas, curnis, and tikas. The review highlights the author’s learned introduction to this field, while noting that literature in languages other than Prakrit and Sanskrit is excluded. The main argument presented by the reviewer is that the volume and variety of this auxiliary literature support the claim of Jainism as the oldest religion of the land. The review traces the evolution of these interpretive texts, beginning with the earliest commentaries written in Prakrit. It argues that the later emergence of Sanskrit auxiliary literature was a posterior development, possibly a refinement of Prakrit, coinciding with the rise of Brahmanical scholarship and the attraction of some Brahmanical luminaries to Jainism. The evidence and sources discussed are the four categories of auxiliary literature. The niryuktis, which interpret technical terms in the Agamic texts, are attributed primarily to Bhadrabahu (II), who holds a virtual monopoly on them. The review notes that as texts became more obscure, a new line of literature, the bhasyas, emerged, with Jinabhadra Gani and Sanghadasa Gani being prominent authors. The most complete interpretations are found in the curnis, written in Prakrit, and the tikas, written in Sanskrit. The curnis and tikas are shown to cover not only Agamic texts but also post-Agamic literature, offering comprehensive knowledge on subjects like acara, darsana, karma, jnana, and even civics and psychology. The review cites numerous specific authors and works to illustrate the vastness of this literature. Among the curni writers, Jinadasa Gani Mahattara is celebrated for authoring at least eight. The earliest Sanskrit tikakara mentioned is Acarya Jinabhadra Gani, who also wrote curnis and bhasyas. Other celebrated tikakaras include Haribhadra Suri, Silankacarya, Vadi-vetala Santi Suri, Abhayadeva Suri, Malayagiri, and Maladhari Hemacandra. The reviewer concludes by congratulating Mohanlal Mehta on his exceptional ability to introduce such an enormous body of literature.

Summary reviewed by a volunteer editor.

Conclusion

This review of Mohanlal Mehta’s *Jain Sahitya-ka Brhad Itihas, Vol. III* highlights the volume’s encyclopedic documentation of auxiliary Jaina literature, specifically the Agamic interpretations of *niryuktis*, *bhasyas*, *curnis*, and *tikas*. A key finding is the evolution of these interpretive texts from Prakrit to Sanskrit, reflecting the increasing obscurity of the original Agamic scriptures over time. The volume’s significance lies in its comprehensive scope, which not only elucidates core religious concepts but also preserves a vast repository of knowledge on diverse secular subjects, including politics, sociology, and psychology. By successfully navigating this immense and complex literary tradition, the author provides an invaluable resource that underscores the profound depth and historical antiquity of Jainism.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The older a religion and its cannonical texts, the more the need to use auxiliary literature to understand them.”
  • “The auxiliary literature considered in this volume, as indicated above, runs into four lines. Of these the niryuktis occupy the first place and their preoccupation is with technical terms in the Agamic texts whose technicality must have enhanced with time.”
  • “More complete interpretation of the Agamic texts are, however, contained in the last two categories of auxiliary literature, viz., curnis and tikas, the former being written in Prakrit or dominantly in Prakrit with Sanskrit admixture and the latter making exclusive use of Sanskrit.”

Works cited in this article

  1. JAIN SAHITYA-KA BRHAD ITIHAS (A Comprehensive History of Jaina Literature in Hindi), Vol. I. Agamic byakhyaen : Mohanlal Mehta

Discussed in this article

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Continue reading

Related articles

The Indian Historical Quarterly

Tattva-Jijnasa (Review)

By Nalinaksha Dutt

December - 1951
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Book Review: New Documents of Jaina Painting

By Paresh Chandra Dasgupta

April 1976
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Book Review – S. A. Jain: Reality

By Satya Ranjan Banerjee

October - 1993
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Book Review – India & Indology

April - 1979
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Reviews

By Kalidas Nag, A. B. M. Habibullah, Arthur Berriedale Keith

March - 1938
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Book Review: Purana Perennis

By Satya Ranjan Banerjee

January - 1994