Skip to content
Browse articles

The First Saka of Citod

By Subimal Chandra Datta

Vol. 7 · No. 2June - 1931pp. 287–300English, Sanskrit

Summary

“The First Saka of Citod” examines the earliest Muslim siege of the fortress of Chittor (Citod) and disentangles legend from history. Chittor, the stronghold of the Mewar Rajputs, endured three major sackings: by Alauddin Khilji in 1303, by Bahadur Shah of Gujarat in 1534–35 and by Emperor Akbar in 1567. Rajput tradition speaks of “three and a half śākās,” referring to these sackings and an earlier partial defeat. While the later events are well documented, the first siege has been romanticised in literature, particularly in the epic poem Padmāvat composed by Malik Muhammad Jayasi. The poem narrates that Alauddin Khilji coveted the beauty of Queen Padmini, besieged Chittor, captured her husband Rana Ratan Singh by treachery and demanded Padmini in exchange. The Rajputs ultimately rescued Ratan Singh by subterfuge, after which Alauddin renewed the siege, captured the fort and massacred its defenders, while the women performed jauhar to avoid dishonour. The article compares this narrative with contemporary Persian chronicles such as Amir Khusraw’s Khaza’in‑ul‑Futuh, the Delhi chronicle Tarikh‑i‑Firishta and later works like the Akbarnama and Ain‑i‑Akbari. It notes that Amir Khusraw mentions only Alauddin’s desire to subdue Chittor for strategic reasons, with no reference to Padmini. Ferishta repeats elements of the Padmāvat story, showing that the legend entered Persian historiography. The article also examines Rajput bardic traditions and local records, which emphasise Rajput heroism but provide little factual detail. By analysing the chronological sequence of siege, capture, negotiations and final fall, the author argues that the Padmini episode is a later interpolation and that Alauddin’s motives were political rather than romantic. He suggests that Ratan Singh may have been released and later executed, and that the jauhar tradition reflects Rajput social customs rather than a specific event. The study therefore seeks to reconstruct a plausible historical narrative from conflicting sources and to highlight how myth-making transformed an episode of medieval warfare into an enduring legend.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

Through critical comparison of literary romances and contemporary chronicles, the article concludes that Alauddin Khilji’s siege of Chittor was primarily a campaign of conquest, not a quest for Padmini. The Padmāvat’s story of the queen’s beauty inspiring the attack appears to be a later poetic embellishment that was subsequently absorbed by Persian and Rajput accounts. While Chittor did fall after intense fighting and a brutal massacre, the legend of Padmini represents the fusion of historical memory with cultural ideals of honour and sacrifice rather than a factual record.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “Our earliest information of the incident 15 furnished by two Moslem writers—Amir Khusrau and Ziyauddin Barani.”
  • “The accounts given by these two writers must therefore be accorded the foremost place of consideration in any attempt 10 reconstruct the history of this episode.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Elliot, History of India, vol, 111
  2. JASB., vol. XXXIX

Discussed in this article

People

Places

  • Citod
  • Mevad
  • Guzrat

Texts & works

  • Kumbhalgadh Pradasti

Dynasties, sects & groups

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Article order

In this issue

Vol. 7 · No. 2
214–244Origin of the Bell-CapitalAchyuta Kumar Mitra245–253Topography in the PuranasSashi Bhusan Chaudhuri253–258Dvaidhibhava in the KautiliyaNarendra Nath Law259–286Bodhisattva Pratimoksa SutraNalinaksha Dutt287–300The First Saka of CitodSubimal Chandra DattaCurrent article301–308Mandana, Suresvara and Bhavabhuti : The Problem of their IdentityDinesh Chandra Bhattacharya309–318Some Notes on Skanda-KarttikeyaManmatha Mukhopadhyay319–330Kulasekhara of KeralaK. Rama Pisharoti331–333A Surya Icon from a Dasavatara Temple, PaganNiharranjan Roy334–342Vilvamangalam SvamiyarsA. Govinda Warrier343–358Early Visnuism and Narayaniya WorshipMrinal Das Gupta359–362Ganga in Ceylon and IndiaJ. C. De362–364An Early Supporter of ShivajiJadunath Sarkar365–366The Webbed Finger of BuddhaAnanda Kentish Coomaraswamy367–370A Few Evidences on the Age of the KathavatthuDwijendra Lal Barua370–371The Age of the Visnu PuranaV. R. Ramachandra Dikshitar371–376More on ManimekhalaSylvain Levi377–379Derivation of PaliS. V. Viswanatha380–383Problems of the NatyasastraHarihara V. Trivedi384–388Technical Terms in the Hindu Revenue SystemU. N. Ghoshal389–410The English Translation of the KautiliyaNarendra Nath Law410–412An Inscription dated in the Reign of Emperor Muhammad ShahDineshchandra Sircar412–412Candasutinam in the Nanaghat Cave InscriptionDineshchandra Sircar413–418The BhagavrttiKshitish Chandra Chatterjee418–419The Authorship of the AnunyasaKshitish Chandra Chatterjee420–427ReviewsAnanda Kentish Coomaraswamy, Subimal Chandra Datta428–432Select Contents of Oriental Journals433–434Bibliographical Notes

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Subimal Chandra Datta

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Reviews

By Ananda Kentish Coomaraswamy, Subimal Chandra Datta

June - 1931
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Reviews

By Nalinaksha Dutt, U. N. Ghoshal, D. Bhattacharya, Panchanan Mitra, Subimal Chandra Datta

March - 1926
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Story of Nurse Pinni—Is it Historically True?

By Subimal Chandra Datta

June - 1925