Skip to content
Browse articles

Stupa and Tomb

By B. M. Barua

Vol. 2 · No. 1March - 1926pp. 16–27English

Summary

The Stupa and Tomb are Buddhist sepulchral structures enshrining cremated remains or ashes of deceased heroes, particularly the Buddha or revered figures. The term "Stupa" (Sanskrit: *Thiapa*, Pali: *Thiapa*) originates from an Indo-European root linked to "tomb" or "tumulus," reflecting its essence as a mound covering a relic chamber (*garbha*). The lower chamber (*Dhatugarbha*) houses the relic-casket, while the upper structure is the mound itself. In contrast, tombs involve burial of the body, often with grave goods, and reflect ancient burial customs. The Stupa evolved from cremation practices, emphasizing the enshrinement of ashes and bones, whereas tombs derive from direct burial traditions. Stupa construction mirrored fort-building, with walls, gateways, and military guards, symbolizing protection of relics. Elaborate mechanisms, like nested chambers or urns, were used to safeguard remains and treasures. The shift from burial to cremation in Stupa practices aimed to eliminate superstitious fears of spirits and elevate aesthetic and ritualistic expression. Buddhist literature notes regional variations, such as bone-bleaching rituals in South India, where decomposed bones were preserved and venerated. The Stupa’s symbolic connection to treasure (*nidhi*) and cultural growth is evident in phrases like *chitu-nidhine* ("hoards the treasure"). Despite its refined form, the Stupa retained primal themes of mortality and ritual, reflecting enduring human beliefs.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

This analysis elucidates the structural and ritualistic distinctions between Buddhist stupas and tombs, tracing their etymological roots and functional evolution. The stupa, as a cremation-based sanctuary, contrasts with the burial-oriented tomb, reflecting divergent cultural practices. The document highlights the linguistic connections between terms like *tumba* and *stupa*, emphasizing their shared origin in mound-like structures while differentiating their ceremonial roles. The Buddhist emphasis on relic enshrinement, elaborate protective mechanisms, and symbolic fortification underscores a shift from burial customs to veneration practices. These findings contribute to understanding the architectural and ritualistic adaptations in ancient religious traditions, particularly the transition from burial to cremation and the symbolic significance of structural forms.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The processes of climination and sublimation were tried along both -the 11098, in the one by retaining the carlier custom of burinl and wreserving the actual body, and in the other by introducing the system of burning and hoarding the remnins of the pyre together with other treasures.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Epigraphia Indica, vol. 11
  2. Childers
  3. Khuddakapatha
  4. Sumangala VilasinI, I, pp. 84, 85
  5. Buddhist India, p. 33

Discussed in this article

People

Places

  • Vana
  • Sanchi 14
  • Tumbavana
  • Tubavana
  • Tumbanagara
  • Vanasivatthi

Texts & works

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Article order

In this issue

Vol. 2 · No. 1
1–15A Short History of CeylonWilhelm Geiger16–27Stupa and TombB. M. BaruaCurrent article27–38Rasātala or the Under‑WorldNandu Lal Dey38–47The Trade of India (from the earliest period up to the 2nd century A.D.)P. T. Srinivas Iyengar47–52SalihotraGirindranath Mukherji53–67Some old Bengali Books and Periodicals in the British MuseumSushil Kumar De67–76Patañjali as he reveals himself in the MahābhāṣyaPrabhat Chandra Chakravarti77–86A Copper‑plate Grant of Viśvarūpa Sena of BengalHariprasad G. Shastri89–128Inscriptional Excursions in Respect of Asoka EdictsB. M. Barua129–146Principles of Hindu Taxation – Canons of TaxationJ. N. C. Ganguly146–157Hindu Politics in Italian – MachiavellismBenoy Kumar Sarkar157–158Two Seals from CutchD. B. Diskalkar159–176Indian Literature Abroad (In China) IIPrabhat Kumar Mukherji177–180The date of Kaniska and Mr. KimuraSten Konow180–182A Note on Excavation‑work by Medieval BengaleesRamesh Basu183–186Perumal's ApostacyK. Rama Pisharoti186–188A Note on the Evidence of Pāṇini on Vāsudeva‑worshipK. G. Subrahmanyam188–191Progress of Archaeological Research in MysoreC. S. Srinivasachari192–195The Cerebralization of the Dental Nasal in PāliVidhushekhara Bhattacharya195–198Calcutta Imperial Library198–203Ownership of the Soil in Ancient India : The evidence of certain texts discussedU. N. Ghoshal204–214ReviewsNalinaksha Dutt, U. N. Ghoshal, D. Bhattacharya, Panchanan Mitra, Subimal Chandra Datta215–219Select Contents of Oriental Journals

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by B. M. Barua

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Obituary Notices (Mrs.C. A. F. Rhys Davids)

By B. M. Barua

December - 1943
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Hathigumpha Inscription of Kharavela

By B. M. Barua

September - 1938
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Minor Brahmi Inscriptions in the Udayagiri and Khandagiri Caves

By B. M. Barua

March - 1938
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Reviews

By B. M. Barua, Sushil Kumar De, U. N. Ghoshal, P. C. Bagchi

June - 1937