Skip to content
Browse articles

Aditya, the supposed author of an Arthasastra

By Maurice Winternitz

Vol. 2 · No. 2June - 1926pp. 408English

Summary

Aditya, often attributed as the author of an *Arthasastra*, has been critically examined in scholarly discourse. G. and H. Q. (pp. 384f) argue that Jayaswal’s *Aditya Arthasistra* relies on a misinterpretation of *जप, Gr. S.*, specifically verses 11, 12, and 16, where the commentator Nirdyana provides the correct interpretation. Narayana’s reading was earlier adopted in Aditya-Stenzler’s 1864 German translation, which rendered a verse as “fighting on the side of the Sun or Usanas,” clarifying it does not imply facing the Sun or Venus during battle. Jayaswal’s interpretation aligns with H. Oldenberg’s translation (*Sacred Books of the East*, vol. xxix, p. 234), which references Aditya or Usanas’ battle formations. However, Stenzler had already cited the *Mahabharata* (3.211.100.20) and Mallinatha’s commentary on *Kumarasambhava* (11.43), which supports the correct reading. Kautilya’s *Arthashastra* (10.3.36) further corroborates this, stating armies should face the Sun’s direction (*prsthatas siryam*). These references confirm Narayana’s interpretation is accurate, disproving the existence of an *Arthasastra* by Aditya. Additionally, the *Apastamba-Gryha-sitra* cannot validate an *Arthasastra* during the period when the *Kalpa-sitras* were still

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

This analysis conclusively refutes the existence of an "Arthasastra of Aditya," demonstrating that Jayaswal's attribution rests on flawed interpretations of key texts. By prioritizing Nirdyana's correct commentary over misreadings in the Japa Grhya Sutra and Aditya's own text, the study reaffirms the accuracy of Stenzler's and Kautilya's accounts. The evidence from the Mahabharata and Mallinatha's commentary further invalidates claims linking Aditya to an independent Arthasastra. This conclusion not only clarifies historical misattributions but also underscores the importance of rigorous textual analysis in resolving scholarly debates about ancient Indian political treatises.

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Article order

In this issue

Vol. 2 · No. 2
225–231Art and Philosophy in Hindu Temple BuildingPrafulla Chandra Basu232–249Rasatala or the Under-WorldNandu Lal Dey250–261Indo-China in the Records of Chinese PilgrimsLouis Finot262–289PatanjaliPrabhat Chandra Chakravarti290–298The Trade of IndiaP. T. Srinivas Iyengar299–312A Comparative Survey of Indian PaintingAjit Ghosh313–342The Kedarpur Copper-plate Inscription of Sri CandradevaHaridas Mitra342–344Sukra�s Economies in Hindu ScienceBenoy Kumar Sarkar345–350Situation of Ravana's Lanka : On the EquatorV. H. Vader351–352Setagiri of the Nasik InseriptionVidyasagar Sadashiv Bakhle353–372Hindu Politics in ItalianBenoy Kumar Sarkar373–383Indian Literature AbroadPrabhat Kumar Mukherji384King Harsa and Aihole InscriptionChintaharan Chakravarti385–407MISCELLANY - The Janapada and the PauraNarendra Nath Law408Aditya, the supposed author of an ArthasastraMaurice WinternitzCurrent article409–410The Evidence of Panini on Vasudeva-WorshipUmesh Chandra Bhattacharya410–413Recent Advance in South Indian EpigraphyC. S. Srinivasachari413–415Rupakas - how many are they ?Ashok Nath Bhattacharya415–416The First commentary on the MahabhasyaM. Hiriyanna416–418A Short note on Mr. Jayaswal's interpretation of a Mahabhasya passage in his "Hindu Polity" (p. 122)K. G. Subrahmanyam418–419A passage of the AbhidharmakosavyakhyaVidhushekhara Bhattacharya420–430Mr. Benoy Kumar Sarkar�s criticism of Hindu Political Theories�A ReplyU. N. Ghoshal430Ghoshal Defending HimselfBenoy Kumar Sarkar431–435ReviewsChintaharan Chakravarti, K. K. Banerji, Jehangir C. Tavadia436–437Select Contents of Orlental Journals438–439BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTES440Obituary NoticeC. S. Srinivasachari

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Maurice Winternitz

All articles →
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Umāsvāmi/Umāsvāti

By Maurice Winternitz

April - 1999
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Alexander and Alexandria in Indian Literature

By Maurice Winternitz

March - 1936
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Notes on the Guhyasamaja‑Tantra and the Age of the Tantras

By Maurice Winternitz

March - 1933
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Jataka Gathas and Jataka Commentary

By Maurice Winternitz

March - 1928