Reviews
By Chintaharan Chakravarti, K. K. Banerji, Jehangir C. Tavadia
Summary
The book *Surisvar Aur Samrat Akbar* (pp. 344-414), translated from Muniraja’s original Gujarati work *Vidyavijaya* by Krsnalal Varma, provides a detailed account of the Jain hermit Hiravijayaji Sari’s life and his influence on Emperor Akbar. Published by D. Vijayadharma Laksmi Jaanamandira in Agra, it includes an introduction by Rai Bahadur Pandit Gauri Shankar Qjha. The work compiles materials from Sanskrit, English, Hindi, Urdu, Gujarati, and Bengali, though the author admits limited proficiency in English and Urdu. While praised for its popular appeal and detailed insights into Jainism and India’s religious landscape during Akbar’s reign, the review critiques its lack of historical rigor, including sparse citations and some chapters reading like fiction. The absence of an index and detailed table of contents is noted as a drawback, though the translation is commended for its elegance. Printing errors in English sections are mentioned. Overall, the book is seen as a valuable contribution to Jain historical literature despite its shortcomings. *Hindu-Pad-Padashahi*, by V.D. Savarkar, explores the Maratha Empire’s Hindu identity and patriotic fervor, blending historical facts with dramatic narrative. The review highlights its emphasis on religious idealism and political solidarity, though it acknowledges its non-chronological approach. Otto Boehtlingk’s *Sanskrit Dictionary* (Petersburger Woerterbuch) is reissued in a photolithographic facsimile by Markert & Petters, Leipzig. The review underscores its significance as a pioneering lexic
AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.
Conclusion
This document offers three distinct historical contributions: first, it highlights Hiravijayaji’s influence on Akbar, shedding light on Jain-Mughal religious dynamics during a pivotal imperial era. Second, it provides a popular yet detailed narrative of Maratha political and religious fervor, emphasizing patriotism over strict historiography. Finally, it acknowledges the long-awaited reprint of Boehtlingk’s Sanskrit dictionary, underscoring its significance for Indology despite publication challenges. Collectively, these works bridge scholarly rigor with public engagement, preserving cultural heritage while addressing gaps in historical and linguistic accessibility. Their enduring appeal—evidenced by reprints and translations—underscores their role in shaping narratives of India’s religious and political past.