Skip to content
Browse articles

Studies in the Epics and Puranas (Review)

By Chintaharan Chakravarti

Vol. 37 · No. 1March - 1961pp. 83–84English
Puranic Literature Analysis

Summary

Studies in the Epics and Puranas (Review) evaluates A. D. Pusalker’s collection of papers about the Indian epics and Puranas. Originally published in journals and other books, the papers examine many aspects of the Ramayana, Mahabharata and Puranic literature. The longest essay is a bibliographical study of research on the epics and Puranas, focusing on scholarly work from the early twentieth century; it occupies about two‑thirds of the volume. The reviewer notes omissions, such as M. S. Aney’s paper on the Ramayana tradition in Ceylon and other titles in provincial languages. The remaining papers explore Puranic cosmogony, whether the Puranas were originally composed in Prakrit or Sanskrit, the relative authenticity of the Vayu and Siva Puranas, stories of Kuruśravana and Kuru‑samvaraṇa, and the historicity of Krishna. Pusalker challenges F. E. Pargiter’s theory that the Puranas began in Prakrit, arguing instead that any Prakrit elements stem from popular speech influencing scribes and reciters. He asserts that the Vayu Purana is a genuine Mahapurana, whereas the Siva Purana is a later work unworthy of that title. On Krishna, Pusalker concludes that the hero was a historical figure involved in the Bharata war around 1400 BC whose deification predated the Buddha. A reconstructed life of Krishna based on epic and Puranic accounts is highlighted. Despite minor oversights, the review emphasises the volume’s value as a comprehensive synthesis of research on the epics and Puranas, encouraging scholars to engage critically with its conclusions.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

This review summarises A. D. Pusalker’s collection of papers, noting that the majority is a bibliographical study of epic and Puranic scholarship. It commends his critical analysis of subjects such as Puranic cosmogony, the authenticity of the Vayu and Siva Puranas and the historicity of Krishna while acknowledging some omissions. Overall, it values the volume as a thorough and useful reference for scholars.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The most important and by far the longest paper is the last one which gives critical and bibliographical analysis of the voluminous works done by scholars here and abroad especially from about the second decade of the twentieth century, on the Epics and Puranas.”
  • “He refuces Pargiter’s theory of the Prakrit origin of the Puranas and explains the cases of so-called Prakritism as being ‘due to the influence of popular speech on the transmitters and transcribers of the Puragas.’”
  • “On the question of the rival claims of the Vayu and Siva Purana to be included in the list of Mahapuranas, a thorough scrutiny of the extant texts reveals, it is shewn, that che”

Works cited in this article

  1. M. S. Ancy’s Ramayana Tradition in the present-day Ceylon (Proceedings of the Fourteenth All-India Oriental Conference, Darbhanga, pp. 206-18)
  2. Pargiter’s theory of the Prakrit origin of the Puranas
  3. Mahatma Gandhi
  4. Bbagavadgita
  5. Siva Purana

Discussed in this article

People

Places

Texts & works

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Chintaharan Chakravarti

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Some Problems of Sanskrit Poetics (Review)

By Chintaharan Chakravarti

March - 1961
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Reviews – The Mahabharata, Santiparvan

By Chintaharan Chakravarti

June - 1959
The Indian Historical Quarterly

India as Known to Panini

By Chintaharan Chakravarti

March - 1959
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Select Inscriptions of Bihar (Review)

By Chintaharan Chakravarti

Sept & Dec 1958

Continue reading

Related articles

The Indian Historical Quarterly

Bibliographical Notes

March - 1956