Skip to content
Browse articles

Sumerians in India

By Laurence Austine Waddell

Vol. 1 · No. 1March - 1925pp. 88–91English

Summary

The author posits that Sumerians, identified as early Aryans in race, speech, and culture, were the ancestors of various civilizations, including those in India, the Mediterranean, and Europe. They argue that the Bharat Khattiya branch of Sumerians, known as Khattiya in older Pali and Ksattriya in Sanskrit, established themselves in the Indus Valley around 3100 BCE. This claim is supported by the discovery of Sumerian seals and associated cultural artifacts in the region, which the author links to Sumerian and Phoenician influences. The author further connects the Khattiya to the Hittites, noting linguistic and etymological parallels, such as the term "Khatti" meaning "ruler" and its equivalence to "Arya" in Sanskrit. They observe similarities between Sumerian and Indo-Aryan religious and cultural practices, particularly the shared name "Induru/Indra" for the chief deity. Additionally, the author identifies parallels between Sumerian and Indian epic king-lists, noting identical names and chronological alignments with Mesopotamian dynasties. The text also explores the linguistic roots of Sumerian and Aryan languages, highlighting structural and etymological similarities. The author concludes that the Sumerians were a foundational Aryan group, with their Khattiya branch playing a pivotal role in civilizing India, much like their western counterparts in Britain and the Mediterranean. Recent discoveries of Sumerian seals in the Indus Valley are cited as corroborative evidence for these claims. [Post-publication note: While the author's conclusions are presented as established, modern scholarship may view some connections as speculative or requiring further evidence.]

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

This document presents compelling evidence linking Sumerians to early Aryans in India, challenging traditional historical narratives. By analyzing linguistic parallels, cultural traits, and archaeological findings—particularly Sumerian seals in the Indus Valley—the study establishes the Khattiya/Ksattriya lineage as a key branch of Sumerian colonizers. The identification of shared king lists, divine names like "Induru/Indra," and maritime connections between Bharat Kuru-paficala and Phoenicians underscores a profound cultural and ancestral continuity. These findings not only reshape understanding of Indo-Aryan origins but also highlight the Sumerians' far-reaching influence across ancient civilizations, positioning them as foundational to both Eastern and Western Aryan traditions.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “the ‘Sumerians” were tho long lost Farly Aryans, in race, speech and ૭૦1101 ; that their chief sea-going and colonizing branches were the Bbarat Kuru-paficala or “Syrio-Pheenician’ Ksattriyas—the Khattiya of the older Pali, and identical with the Khatti or “Hitt-ites” of Asia Minor, that they had established themselves in Mesopotaumia at the head of the Persian Gulf by 3100”
  • “I found that many of the names of these kings were sub- stantially identical with the names of ancient Khatti kings થઇ found ભા their કોઈ extant monuments and cuneiform docuinents of Asia Miuor aud Syria—-_Phre_nici_a._”
  • “I further found that the Father God of these Sumerians and Pheenicians was called by them “Induru”, the *Indara” of the Khattt or Hittites, હાત was the source 10 both name and attributes of the Indra બ the Indo-Aryans.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Brahminda Puranas
  2. Jaina tradition

Discussed in this article

Places

Texts & works

Dynasties, sects & groups

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Article order

In this issue

Vol. 1 · No. 1
1–4IntroductionSten Konow4–17The Date of Zoroaster and the RgvedaArthur Berriedale Keith18–30The Northern BuddhismHariprasad G. Shastri31–36Bharavi and DandinSushil Kumar De36–42Some Aspects of the Economic Life in Ancient India ( AS DEPICTED IN THE RGVEDA )Prafulla Chandra Basu42–50The Aryan Rule of IndiaW. F. Gunawardhana50–58Message from Barhut Jataka LabelsB. M. Barua59–68The Vicitra NatakIndubhusan Banerjee69–79Bengal School of ArtSatish Chandra Mitra79–85Rama Raya, Regent of Vijayanagar (1542–1565)H. Heras86–87Seniya BimbisaraHem Chandra Raychaudhuri88–91Sumerians in IndiaLaurence Austine WaddellCurrent article91–94Some observations on Pusyamitra and his EmpireRamesh Chandra Majumdar94–99Politics and Political History in the MahabharataNarayan Chandra Banerji100–102Etymologies of Kubha lagh, eagh-, gevaya, and Laghulo.Muhammad Shahidullah103–111The Bhasa ProblemK. Rama Pisharoti111–116Some Wall‑Paintings from KelaniyaStella Kramrisch116–119Pāvapuri and its Temple PrasastiPuranchand Nahar119–125Mandukya Upanishad and the Gaudapada KarikasVidhushekhara Bhattacharya126–129Lakshmana Sena’s Flight from NadiaC. V. Vaidya130–136Rasātala or the Under‑WorldNandu Lal Dey137–166The Kosalas in Ancient IndiaBimala Charan Law167–171MISCELLANY - Oriental Studies in Russia172–176Progress of Historical Research in the Madras PresidencyC. S. Srinivasachari176–179Recent Discoveries in Sind and the PunjabS. K. Chatterjee179–184The All-India Oriental Conference (Third Session)Sushil Kumar De185The Date of Manik Ganguli's Dharma MangalMuhammad Shahidullah185–186Oriental Studies in JapanR. Kimura187–191ReviewsRamesh Chandra Majumdar, B. M. Barua, Kaccayana, D. M. Bhattacharya192–196Select Contents of Oriental Journals197–198BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTES

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.