Science In Jain Canonical Literature
By Laxmi Chandra Jain, Manikant Shah
Summary
The article critiques Euro-American Western science's dominance, highlighting its limitations rooted in 16th-17th century thinkers like Descartes, Newton, Copernicus, and Galileo, which emphasized particularism and reductionism. It argues that the claim of science being the sole source of valid knowledge is unfounded, noting a growing recognition that religious knowledge contains valuable insights often dismissed as irrational. The text then shifts to Jainism, one of the world's oldest religions, tracing it to Vardhman or Mahavira, a contemporary of Gautam Buddha and the 24th Tirthankar in a lineage of spiritual teachers. Jainism emphasizes conquering the flesh to achieve supreme purity, infinite knowledge, and happiness, aligning with broader Indian religious goals. While accepting revealed knowledge and transcendental experience, Jainism rejects the authority of the Vedas, particularly ritualistic aspects. The article introduces Prof. Laxmi Chandra Jain, a scholar with 33 years of teaching experience, known for his 91 publications, including *TAO of Jain Sciences*, and his role as Director of the Acharya Vidyasagar Research Institute. His work explores Jain mathematics and canonical literature, contributing to the understanding of Jain thought and science.
AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.
Conclusion
This document highlights a critical re-evaluation of Western scientific paradigms and their limitations, particularly their reductionist and particularistic approach rooted in 16th-17th century thought. It challenges the Euro-American scientific claim of being the sole provider of valid knowledge, emphasizing that religious and traditional systems, such as Jainism, contain valuable insights comparable to scientific understanding. The analysis of Jain canonical literature by Prof. Laxmi Chandra Jain underscores the depth of Jain philosophical and scientific inquiry, particularly its pursuit of infinite knowledge and purity. The document also contextualizes Jainism’s historical significance, its distinction from Vedic traditions, and its parallels with Buddhism. By presenting Jainism as a rigorous system of thought, the text advocates for a more inclusive and holistic approach to knowledge, bridging ancient wisdom and modern science.