Skip to content
Browse articles

Salient Common Features between Jainism and Buddhism

By B. H. Kapadia

Vol. 23 · No. 2October - 1988pp. 49–59English

Summary

The article “Salient Common Features between Jainism and Buddhism” sets out to show that although Jainism and Buddhism developed distinct doctrines, they share a surprising number of values and social attitudes. Both religions arose in eastern India in the 6th century BCE and were founded by Kshatriya princes who renounced worldly life. The article notes that both traditions rejected the ritual authority of the Vedas and the power of Brahmanical priests; they taught that rites and sacrifices could not lead to liberation but that personal effort and ethical conduct were paramount. Jain and Buddhist texts emphasise truthfulness, non‑violence (ahiṃsā), celibacy and detachment from material comforts. In both traditions, the ultimate goal is liberation from the cycle of rebirth (saṃsāra), and the means to achieve it involve self‑discipline, meditation and the destruction of karma. Neither religion posits a creator god; instead, they are non‑theistic and rely on the moral law of karma and the example of enlightened beings. Both religions opened their doors to women and people of lower castes, allowing them to become monks or nuns and to pursue salvation. By preaching in the language of the common people, both traditions spread rapidly among lay followers. After outlining these similarities, the article discusses differences. Jainism and Buddhism differ in their attitudes to asceticism: Jain monks practise extreme austerities, whereas the Buddha advocated a Middle Way, avoiding both indulgence and self‑mortification. The article points out that Jains believe in an eternal soul (jīva) while Buddhists deny the existence of a permanent self, teaching instead the doctrine of anatta (no‑self). Jainism emphasises rigorous vows of non‑violence and includes practices such as sweeping the ground to avoid harming insects, whereas Buddhist ahimsa is interpreted more pragmatically. The article also notes that the Jain community gives prominence to lay followers, whereas Buddhism relies heavily on the monastic Sangha. Historically, Jainism remained confined largely to India, while Buddhism spread widely across Asia before declining in its homeland. Despite these differences, the author argues that the shared emphasis on compassion, ethical conduct and liberation makes the two traditions closer to one another than to Brahmanical Hinduism, and that understanding their common ground can foster inter‑religious dialogue.

Summary reviewed by a volunteer editor.

Conclusion

The article demonstrates that Jainism and Buddhism, though distinct in doctrine, share many ethical and social principles. Both reject Vedic ritualism and caste hierarchy, teach non‑violence and truthfulness, and offer paths to liberation accessible to all genders and classes. Recognising these similarities helps explain the historical coexistence and mutual influence of the two traditions. The piece concludes that comparing Jainism and Buddhism illuminates the broader Śramaṇa movement and shows how two non‑theistic Indian religions addressed common moral and philosophical questions.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “In the initial days of the study of Jainism and Buddhism it was generally believed by Western scholars that Jainism is an offshoot of Buddhism, that it is a branch of Buddhism.”
  • “These two powerful religions considered as heterodox by the school of Indian philosophy do not believe in the authority of the Vedas i.e. they consider the Vedas as composed by human beings like the works of Kalidasa, Bhavabhuti, Shakespeare, Milton, Shelly, Goete, Schiller, etc.”
  • “The promulgators of these two religions, Mahavira! and Buddha were Ksatriyas, both hailed from a royal family, both preached in the language of the people with a view to appeal to their heart, both lived the worldly life fora definite period of time and on suitable opportunity both renounced the world full of misery with the intention to find the highest and the ultimate truth.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Upasaka Dasanga, Adh. 8
  2. Mahaparinivvanasutta
  3. The Dohakosas of Saraha and Kanha

Discussed in this article

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.