Skip to content
Browse articles

Haribhadra's Saddarsana Samuccaya: Verses 81-84: A Study

By Ram Krishna Bhattacharya

Vol. 36 · No. 3January - 2002pp. 134–148English

Summary

Haribhadra Sūri’s eighth‑century Ṣaḍdarśanasamuccaya is a doxographical poem that summarises six classical Indian philosophical systems—Buddhist, Nyāya, Sāṃkhya, Jaina, Vaiśeṣika and Mīmāṃsā—and adds an exposition on the materialist Lokāyata school. The work advances the Jain doctrine of anekāntavāda (non‑absolutism) by demonstrating that each system, though internally coherent, apprehends only a partial aspect of truth. This article focuses on verses 81–84, which employ the allegory of a wolf’s footprint to critique materialists who infer the non‑existence of liberation and karma from limited sensory experience. The author explains that just as seeing a footprint does not prove that a wolf is present, relying solely on empirical evidence cannot justify sweeping metaphysical conclusions. Haribhadra argues that materialists misunderstand scriptural testimonies and reject the possibility of moral causation and life after death. The article traces the sources of the “wolf’s footprint” parable, compares Haribhadra’s arguments with those of Buddhist and Nyāya philosophers and analyses commentaries by later Jain scholars. It situates Haribhadra’s critique within the broader context of Jain epistemology, which classifies knowledge into different standpoints (naya) and emphasises that comprehensive understanding requires synthesising multiple perspectives. Through careful philological analysis, the article shows how Haribhadra used irony and parable to encourage inter‑philosophical dialogue rather than to denounce other schools. The study concludes that the verses exemplify Jainism’s commitment to intellectual humility and pluralism.

Summary reviewed by a volunteer editor.

Conclusion

By examining Haribhadra’s analysis of the “wolf’s footprint” verses, the article highlights the Jain principle that no single philosophical standpoint captures the entire truth. Haribhadra critiques materialists not to denounce them but to show the limits of empirical inference and to encourage appreciation of multiple perspectives. His doxography summarises various systems impartially and upholds the Jain view that truth is multifaceted. This study underscores the historical depth of inter‑philosophical dialogue in India and the relevance of Jain non‑absolutism for contemporary debates on pluralism.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “Humour is not a strong point of ancient Indian philosophers, or philosophers in general.”
  • “The parable originated most probably with the Carvakas and was quite well known in the Jain, Buddhist and Brahminical circles.”
  • “What the vastly learned ones speak of (as true) is but similar to (the statement), 'Oh ! Blessed One ! This is the footprint of the wolf.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Mahabharata
  2. Prasannapad@
  3. Madhyamakasastra
  4. Tarka-rahasya-dipika
  5. Lokatattvanirnaya

Discussed in this article

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Ram Krishna Bhattacharya

All articles →
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Pre-Carvaka Materialism in Vasudevahimdi

By Ram Krishna Bhattacharya

January - 2009
Sambodhi

Symbolic and Mimetic fire-Altars: A new approach to the Sulbasutras

By Ram Krishna Bhattacharya

2009
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

The Carvakas and the Jains: An Overview

By Ram Krishna Bhattacharya

April - 2008
Sambodhi

Various Views on Svabhava: A Critical Survey

By Ram Krishna Bhattacharya

2006