Skip to content
Browse articles

Is the Devi-bhagavata the Source of the Deogarh Relief of Nara-Narayana?

By Rajendra Chandra Hazra

Vol. 29 · No. 4December - 1953pp. 387–392English
Gupta Period Art

Summary

Responding to a previous claim that the Deogarh temple relief of the sages Nara and Narayana derives from the Devi‑bhagavata Purana, this article re‑examines the evidence. The author summarises the Devi‑bhagavata narrative in which Dharma’s sons Nara and Narayana perform penance at Badarikasrama; Indra, fearing their austerities, sends wild animals, storms and finally Cupid and celestial nymphs to distract them. He notes that art historians date the Deogarh relief to the late fifth or early sixth century, whereas most scholars place the composition of the Devi‑bhagavata much later, around the eighth century. Using textual comparison, he argues that the relief’s imagery better matches accounts in older sources like the Mahabharata and that pushing back the Devi‑bhagavata’s date to support the identification is unwarranted. The sculptor may have drawn on multiple traditions or lost stories. The article cautions against dating texts solely on iconographic parallels and emphasises the need for careful correlation of literary and artistic evidence.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

The article challenges the view that the Deogarh relief draws on the Devi‑bhagavata, pointing out chronological and narrative inconsistencies. It suggests that the sculptor likely relied on earlier epic or puranic traditions and that using the relief to date the Devi‑bhagavata risks misinterpretation. Cross‑disciplinary analysis is essential when linking art with literature.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “the scenes of the penance of the sages Nara and Narayana in the eastern niche of the Gupta temple of Deogarh in the Jhanst district of U.P. are based on the story of Nara-Nirayana as contained in the Devi-bbagavata (Benares edition) 1૪. 5-10 (cspecially chap. 6)”
  • “the Devi-bbagavata must have been written later than at least 750 A.D.”
  • “it will be evident that the story has more points of difference from पीट relief than those of agreement with it.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Indian Historical Quarterly, XXVII, 1951
  2. History of Indian and Indonesian Art, 4/4, 9
  3. History of Fine Art in India and Ceylon, 1939
  4. Vaisnavism, Saivism, and Minor Religions Systems, p. 49
  5. Outline of the Religious Literature of India, pp. 229 fl.

Discussed in this article

People

Dynasties, sects & groups

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Rajendra Chandra Hazra

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Professional Jesters of the Vedic Age

By Rajendra Chandra Hazra

June & Sept. 1962
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Did Harita know the Tantras?

By Rajendra Chandra Hazra

June & September 1960
The Indian Historical Quarterly

A Newly Discovered Work of Bhatta Bhavadeva of Bengal

By Rajendra Chandra Hazra

March - 1956
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Mahabhagavata-Purana, a work of Bengal

By Rajendra Chandra Hazra

March - 1952

Continue reading

Related articles

The Indian Historical Quarterly

Ramayana Scenes in Rajasthan Sculptures

By Ratna Chandra Agrawala

June - 1954
Journal of Indian History and Culture

Ardhanarisvara Art Across Indian Cultures and Periods

By Bratindra Nath Mukherjee

September 2016
Journal of Indian History and Culture

Reevaluating a Gupta-era Jaina Yakshini Sculpture in Houston

By Nanditha C. Krishna

September 2008