Skip to content
Browse articles

Ghaṭṭīṭakacagupta

By Parmeshwari Lal Gupta

Vol. 22 · No. 4December - 1946pp. 316–319English

Summary

Ghaṭṭīṭakacagupta by Parmeshwari Lal Gupta investigates a little‑known name appearing on certain Gupta‑era coins and inscriptions. Gupta analyses copper coins inscribed with the legend ‘Ghaṭṭīṭakagupta’ and compares their weight, iconography and calligraphy with other early Gupta coinage. He argues that these coins belong to an intermediate ruler between the legendary chieftain Ghaṭotkacha and the historically attested Emperor Chandragupta I. By examining palaeography, Gupta dates the coins to the late third or early fourth century CE. He suggests that Ghaṭṭīṭakacagupta, possibly a son or close relative of Ghaṭotkacha, may have ruled a small principality before the rise of the imperial Guptas. The article also reviews copper‑plate inscriptions that mention a similar name and evaluates whether this figure could be identified with Ghatotkacha himself. Gupta concludes that Ghaṭṭīṭakacagupta was a distinct ruler who helped to consolidate Gupta power in Magadha, bridging the gap between myth and history. This finding contributes to our understanding of the early Gupta genealogy and the transition from local chieftains to empire builders.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

Gupta’s numismatic study introduces Ghaṭṭīṭakacagupta as an early Gupta ruler whose coins illuminate the dynasty’s formative period. Recognising this transitional figure helps clarify the lineage leading up to Chandragupta I and underscores the value of coins in reconstructing history.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The initial Ghato and guptah in the margin naturally suggest that the name of the issuer of the coin was Ghatotkacagupta; but so far no king among the Imperial Guptas is known with this name other than Ghatotkaca, the father of Candragupta I.”
  • “To me, Ghatotkacagupta of this inscription and that of the seal and the coin is one and the same person.”
  • “Thus there is every reason to conclude that Ghatotkacagupta of the coin, seal and the inscription is one and he succeeded Kumaragupta | end preceded Skandagupta; and he can now be safely placed in the Gupta chronology between them.”

Works cited in this article

  1. B. M.C., p. 149, pl. XXIV, 3; introduction p. liv.
  2. Rep. Arch. S. 1., 1908-4, p. 102
  3. J.R,.A.S., 1906, p. 153; BF. H. 1., p. 266, n. 2.
  4. Op. Cit., p. liv.
  5. Ep.ind., XXVI1, p. 117, D.C. Sarkar; Select Inscriptions, pp. 495.96

Discussed in this article

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Parmeshwari Lal Gupta

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Samvatsaras in the Parivrajaka Inscriptions

By Parmeshwari Lal Gupta

June & Sept. 1961
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Place of Mahaksatrapa Isvaradatta in the Western Ksatrapa Chronology

By Parmeshwari Lal Gupta

Sept & Dec 1958
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Satavahana Kings named Sati

By Parmeshwari Lal Gupta

December - 1956
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Eastern Expansion of the Kusana Empire

By Parmeshwari Lal Gupta

September - 1953