Skip to content
Browse articles

A Note on the Later Somavaṁśīs

By Dineshchandra Sircar

Vol. 22 · No. 4December - 1946pp. 300–307English

Summary

A Note on the Later Somavaṁśīs by D.C. Sircar forms part of the Miscellany section. It addresses genealogical ambiguities concerning the Later Somavaṁśī rulers of Orissa. Sircar critiques translations of the Narsingpur and Balijhari copper‑plate grants that list kings such as Dharmaratha, Nahuṣa, Janamejaya and Yayāti. Some scholars had interpreted these names as evidence of two parallel Somavaṁśī branches, with an elder brother of Nahuṣa ruling at Kaṭaka (Cuttack). Sircar argues that this reading is mistaken; the genealogy is continuous and does not imply a separate branch. He analyses Sanskrit verses and clarifies that phrases thought to indicate an elder brother actually describe Nahuṣa himself. The article includes a genealogical table showing the succession from Yayāti to Dharmaratha, Nahuṣa, Janamejaya and his descendants. Sircar emphasises that proper punctuation and understanding of honorifics are essential in interpreting copper‑plate inscriptions. By correcting the lineage, he shortens the chronology and removes unnecessary hypothetical rulers. The note thus exemplifies how careful philological examination can rectify historical misunderstandings and contributes to a more accurate history of the Somavaṁśīs.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

Sircar’s note clarifies that there was no separate elder branch of the Later Somavaṁśīs; misinterpretations of inscriptional phrases led to genealogical confusion. His philological analysis streamlines the dynasty’s succession and highlights the importance of precise reading of epigraphic records.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “All of these theories are based on wrong interpretations of epigraphic passages.”
  • “The poet, however, clearly says that the two rdgtras of Utkala and Kosala (South Kosala), which had been seized (avagtabdha) by the combatant chiefe, were freed from enemies by the prowess of Yayati’s arms.”
  • “The description of the collateral line of the Somavamél family in the Bhubaneswar inscription leaves hardly any doubt that Nahuga belonged to the main line and was not a son of Abhimanyu.”

Works cited in this article

  1. JBORS., XVII, p. 1 ff.
  2. JASB., VII, p. 558f.
  3. JRASB-L, v; pp. 407-15
  4. Pavanadita
  5. Udayapur Praéasti.

Discussed in this article

People

Texts & works

  • Balijhari grant
  • Narsingpur or Balijhari grant

Dynasties, sects & groups

  • Somavaméis

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Dineshchandra Sircar

All articles →
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Some Unpublished Jaina Sculptures of Ganesa from the Western India

By Dineshchandra Sircar

Jan - 1975
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Mahavira’s Theory of Samatva Yoga — a Psycho-Analytical Approach

By Dineshchandra Sircar

Jan - 1975
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Jaina Temples in East Bengal in the Seventeenth Century

By Dineshchandra Sircar

Jan - 1975
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Date of the Periplus

By Dineshchandra Sircar

March and June 1963