Skip to content
Browse articles

Nalanda Seals of Budhagupta and Visnugupta

By A. Ghosh

Vol. 19 · No. 2June - 1943pp. 119–125English

Summary

This paper presents two royal seals unearthed at Nālandā that illuminate Gupta genealogy. One seal names Viṣṇugupta Candrāditya as son of Kumāragupta and grandson of Puru­gupta; another names Budhagupta as son of Puru­gupta and grandson of Nara­siṁha­gupta. By collating the seal inscriptions the author reconstructs a genealogical table showing four successive rulers between A.D. 467 and 476. The seals clarify that Budhagupta was Puru­gupta’s son rather than a younger brother of Skanda­gupta and confirm that Viṣṇugupta belonged to a junior branch. They also illustrate how Narasiṁha­gupta’s line diverged from the main succession. The article discusses palaeographic features of the seals, noting their late Gupta script, and considers their historical implications: they force a revision of the chronology of Gupta succession, support the view that several short‑lived reigns occurred between Skanda­gupta and Budhagupta, and demonstrate that the Gupta emperors maintained a presence at Nālandā. The author stresses the importance of epigraphic evidence for settling debates about the genealogies of Indian dynasties and suggests that further archaeological exploration at Nālandā may yield additional seals linking other obscure rulers.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

By decoding two fragmentary seals from Nālandā, this study clarifies the succession of late Gupta rulers and confirms that Budhagupta was the son of Puru­gupta. The seals’ genealogical lists expose a short series of rulers between Skanda­gupta and Budhagupta and place Viṣṇugupta in a collateral branch. These findings refine our understanding of Gupta chronology and highlight the value of epigraphic discoveries in reconstructing ancient Indian dynastic history.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “It will be seen that line 1 contains the names of Gupta and Ghatotkaca, the missing portions of lines 2 and 3 of Candragupta[I] and Samudragupta respectively, line 4 of Candragupta [II], line 5 of Kumiaragupta, line 6 of Pirugupta and line 8 of Budhagupta.”
  • “The seal therefore leaves absolutely no doubt about the fact that Budbagupta was the son of Pirugupta.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Epigraphia Indica, vol. XXVI, Pp: 235
  2. Nalanda and Its Epigrapbic Materials (Memoirs of the Archaological Survey of India, No. 66)
  3. Ep. Ind., vol. XXVI, p. 236
  4. Sarnath inscription of A.D. 473
  5. Bhitari sea!

Discussed in this article

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by A. Ghosh

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Prehistoric Exploration in India

By A. Ghosh

March - 1948
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Seals of an unknown Dynasty from Nalanda

By A. Ghosh

June - 1943