Skip to content
Browse articles

Some Old Coins Re‑discussed

By V. V. Mirashi

Vol. 18 · No. 1March - 1942pp. 71–74English

Summary

This numismatic study revisits several early Indian coins that have been misread or misattributed in prior scholarship. The author begins with gold coins bearing the legend ‘Rai Vira’ or ‘Virasinha’, which earlier writers associated with obscure rulers. Through careful examination of the script and comparison with inscriptions, he argues that these coins should be attributed to the Chahamana king Virasimhadeva. Other sections discuss coins attributed to the Kalachuri ruler Sankaragana and to the Nagas, correcting misinterpretations of legends and symbols. The article includes plates illustrating the coins and traces the provenance of each specimen. By analysing calligraphic style and epigraphic formulae, the author provides more secure datings and attributions. He also comments on the economic and political significance of the coins, noting that their distribution sheds light on trade networks and regional influence. The study emphasises the necessity of examining original specimens rather than relying on published sketches and warns against perpetuating errors in catalogues. Overall, the paper contributes to the refinement of early Indian numismatics by offering corrected readings and more plausible historical contexts for several enigmatic issues.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

By re‑examining legends and symbols on early Indian coins, the author corrects several longstanding misattributions. His careful readings link coins to specific kings such as Virasimhadeva and clarify the chronology of early medieval dynasties. The article underscores the importance of direct inspection and contextual analysis in numismatic research.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The puzzle is solely due to a mistake in the decipherment of the legend, which has not been noticed so far.”
  • “We can therefore identify him with the king Vitasimha of the Kacchapaghata dynasty of Nalapura who is known from a copper-plate grant' dated Vikrama Samvat 1177 (A.D. 1120).”
  • “The figure cannog be a representation of Vamana who usually appears as a dwarf with an umbrella over his head, receiving a gift from Bali.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, Vol. LXVI (1897), p. 308
  2. Journal of the American Oriental Society, vol. VI, pp. 542 ff.
  3. Cunningham's CMI., Pl. VIII, No..1
  4. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 1g00, pp. 123ff
  5. Mr. Allan in the Numismatic Chronicle, Fifth Series, Vol. XVII (1937), p- 99

Discussed in this article

People

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by V. V. Mirashi

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Epoch of the Ganga Era

By V. V. Mirashi

June & September 1960
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Ujjayini was the Capital of the Later Aulikaras

By V. V. Mirashi

September - 1959
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Manor Plates of Rastrakuta Dantidurga: Saka Year 671

By V. V. Mirashi

September - 1959
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Bhavabhuti and Umbeka

By V. V. Mirashi

Mar-58