Skip to content
Browse articles

Central Asiatic Provinces of the Maurya Empire

By H. C. Seth

Vol. 13 · No. 3September -�1937pp. 400–417English

Summary

This study reconstructs the geography of the Maurya Empire’s central Asian provinces by combining Greek accounts with the evidence of Aśoka’s edicts. The author begins by noting that Aśoka’s inscriptions refer to territories inhabited by Greeks (Yonas), Kambojas and other groups beyond the Indus, showing that the Mauryan realm extended well into present‑day Afghanistan and north‑western Pakistan. He cites Strabo’s report that the Indus marked the boundary between the Maurya and Syrian empires and points out that Greek writers identified the Yonas, Kambojas, Gandharas and Katas as Mauryan subjects. These border peoples, who lived on both sides of the river, were included among Aśoka’s ‘borderers’, indicating that imperial authority reached beyond the traditional frontiers of India. The article then discusses the satrapies that formed the Mauryan western and north‑western provinces, examining place‑names preserved in the rock edicts and correlating them with archaeological sites. Particular attention is paid to Kamboja, identified with the Oxus region, and to the country of the Yavanas (Greeks) around Alexandria‑in‑Arachosia. The author argues that the Mauryas inherited Achaemenid administrative divisions and integrated them into their empire, retaining Persian titles and practices while promoting Buddhist policies. He also analyses passages in the Arthashastra and the Mahavamsa to identify the governors and provincial capitals in the north‑west and central India. Economic evidence, such as coin finds and references to trade routes, is marshalled to show that these provinces were prosperous and strategically vital. The article concludes that the Mauryan Empire’s western frontier lay not at the Indus but further west, and that the administration of the frontier provinces was more complex than has often been assumed. By synthesising Greek, Indian and epigraphic sources, the author reconstructs a picture of a vast, multicultural empire whose borders encompassed Greeks, Persians and numerous Central Asian peoples.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

By comparing Aśoka’s edicts with Greek descriptions, the study shows that the Maurya Empire extended far beyond the Indus and incorporated a mosaic of peoples. It emphasises that the so‑called frontier provinces were rich and strategically crucial, and that Mauryan administrators integrated pre‑existing Persian and Hellenistic traditions. The article ends by urging historians to recognise the empire’s multicultural character and the complexity of its provincial administration.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The empire under the first Maurya emperor Candragupta extended much beyond the Indus.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Rock Edict 11. Girnar Version, CII, vol. I, p. 2.
  2. Sylvain Lévi

Discussed in this article

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by H. C. Seth

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Identification of Parvataka and Porus

By H. C. Seth

June - 1941
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Note on Vryala as the Greek kingly title

By H. C. Seth

September - 1939
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Kingdom of Khotan under the Mauryas

By H. C. Seth

September - 1939
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Vṛṣala, the Greek Kingly Title of Candragupta Maurya

By H. C. Seth

Dec-37