Skip to content
Browse articles

Date of Parthasarathimisra and Sequence of his Works

By K. S. Ramaswami Sastri

Vol. 13 · No. 3September -�1937pp. 488–497English

Summary

In this essay the author attempts to determine when Parthasārathi Miśra, an important Mīmāṃsā scholar, lived and to arrange his works in chronological order. Parthasārathi provides few personal details: he names his father Yajaitman but omits his era and birthplace. Scholars therefore infer his date from citations by other authors. The article notes that Madhava Vidyāranya and other fourteenth‑century thinkers quote Parthasārathi, so he must have lived earlier. Conversely, he quotes the works of Kumārila Bhaṭṭa and Maṇḍana Miśra, indicating that he post‑dates the eighth century. Halāyudha’s ‘Mīmāṃsā‑sarvasva’, written in the late eleventh or early twelfth century, also references Parthasārathi’s writings. By weighing these clues, the author argues that Parthasārathi flourished in the eleventh century, perhaps around AD 1050. The article then analyses the sequence of his treatises. His ‘Śāstra‑dīpikā’ is a commentary on Kumārila’s Ślokavārttika; his ‘Nyāyaratnamāla’ is a shorter compendium; and his ‘Tantraratna’ discusses the methodology of Dharma. Internal evidence suggests that the ‘Śāstra‑dīpikā’, being a comprehensive work, was likely written first, followed by the more concise manuals. The author evaluates citations between these works and compares them with later glosses to determine their relative chronology. The essay concludes that Parthasārathi’s lucid commentaries popularised Mīmāṃsā doctrines in eastern India and that his ideas influenced both later Mīmāṃsakas and the authors of Dharmaśāstra digests. By establishing an approximate date and order for his writings, the article contributes to a clearer understanding of the development of Mīmāṃsā scholarship.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

The article ends by placing Parthasārathi Miśra in the eleventh century and by proposing that his encyclopaedic ‘Śāstra‑dīpikā’ preceded his shorter works. It stresses that dating scholars through intertextual references remains imprecise but is essential for tracing the evolution of Indian philosophical traditions. The author underscores Parthasārathi’s lasting impact on Mīmāṃsā studies.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “Parthasirathimisra does not mention in his works the period पा which he flourished or the place in which he was bomn.”
  • “It may be pointed ૦૫૬ here that he 15 quoted as an authority by a host of writers on Plirvamimimsa belonging to the Modern Period.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Jaiminiyanyayamalavistara
  2. Nititettvavirbbava
  3. Mimamsasastrasarvasva
  4. Tattvabindn
  5. Nyayaratnamala

Discussed in this article

People

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by K. S. Ramaswami Sastri

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

A Mythical Commentary on Saradatanayas Bhavaprakasa

By K. S. Ramaswami Sastri

June - 1929
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Tibetan Translation of the Sadhanamala: A Reply

By K. S. Ramaswami Sastri

March - 1927