Skip to content
Browse articles

Maurya Candragupta and Mayurbhanj Rulers

By Binayak Misra

Vol. 13 · No. 3September -�1937pp. 418–431English

Summary

This article explores the ancestry of the Maurya emperor Chandragupta and links it to the rulers of Mayurbhanj in Orissa. The Sanskrit drama ‘Mudrārākṣasa’ portrays Chandragupta as the son of a Śūdra woman, whereas the Buddhist chronicle ‘Mahāvaṃsa’ traces him to the warrior Moriya clan descended from the Ikṣvāku lineage. The author seeks to reconcile these traditions by analysing copper‑plate grants issued by the Bhanja rulers of Mayurbhanj, who claimed to be descendants of the Moriya chiefs. After reviewing existing grants such as the Bamanghati, Khandadeuli and Ukhunda plates, he describes a newly discovered copper‑plate from Ukhunda near Khiching. This charter is larger than earlier plates, bears medallions with lions and bulls, and records a land grant by a king styled as Morasvamin (lord of the Moriyas). Its genealogy lists a succession of kings whose names closely resemble those of the early Mauryas. The author argues that these similarities show a direct connection between the Maurya and Mayurbhanj dynasties. He also analyses linguistic features of the inscriptions, noting that the titles ‘Moriya’ and ‘Maurya’ were interchangeable in Prakrit. By comparing the record with Puranic lists and Buddhist sources, the article contends that Chandragupta’s family belonged to the Moriya clan of Kṣatriyas, contradicting the assertion that he was of low birth. The study further examines the political history of Mayurbhanj, showing that the Bhanja rulers rose to prominence in the seventh and eighth centuries and that their adoption of the Maurya genealogy legitimised their authority. The author concludes that the Mayurbhanj copper‑plates provide independent support for the traditional view that Chandragupta belonged to the Moriya clan and that the Maurya dynasty’s legitimacy rested on its claimed descent from the ancient Ikṣvākus. This conclusion challenges accounts that derive Chandragupta’s lineage from humble origins.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

The article concludes that the newly discovered Mayurbhanj copper‑plates strengthen the case that Chandragupta was a scion of the Moriya clan, not a man of humble birth. By demonstrating close correspondences between the Mayurbhanj genealogies and early Maurya names, it supports the view that the Mauryas claimed descent from the Ikṣvāku line. The author argues that these findings highlight the importance of regional inscriptions in clarifying royal genealogies.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “According to the version recorded in घट Sanskrit dram Afuddrdksass, Candragupta the founder of घाट Maurya dynasty, was the son of Muri, 0 Sudra woman, This Mura onigin of Maurya Candragupta was called पा question when the old [201 works were discovered.”
  • “It should be borne 10 mind that the presenc Bhanja family of Mayurbhanj belongs to the Va$istha Gotra and claims descent from the Solar dynasty.”
  • “Evidently the Maurya dynasty sprang from the Solar race. The Solar origin(of the Maurya dynasty recorded in घाट Ceylonese chronicle finds also corroboration 11 the stone 10501120103 at Baghlt 10 Khandesh of Govindaraja of 1૦69 A.D."”

Works cited in this article

  1. Cambridge History of India, vol. 1, p. 470
  2. Political History of Ancient India, 9. 18.

Discussed in this article

People

  • Candragupta 73
  • Ganadanda-Virabhadra
  • Dr. H. C. Raychaudhuri
  • Ranabhafjadeva
  • Rijabhanjadeva
  • Satrubharijadeva
  • Prthvihhanjadeva
  • Gourishankar Hirachand Ojha
  • Mura

Places

Dynasties, sects & groups

  • Bhanja family

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Binayak Misra

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Folklore and Paurāṇic Tradition of god Jagannātha

By Binayak Misra

Dec-37
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Ganjam-Grant of �Jayavarmadeva of Unmattakesari's Time

By Binayak Misra

September - 1936
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Narasimhanatha Stone Inscription of Vaijaladeva

By Binayak Misra

September - 1936
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Daspalla Copper-Plate Agreement

By Binayak Misra

December - 1933