Browse articles

Reviews and Select Contents of Oriental }oumals

By Nalinaksha Dutt, Mano Mohan Ghosh, Dhirendra Chandra Ganguly, Arthur Berriedale Keith

Vol. 13 · No. 3September -�1937pp. 529 - 540English

Summary

The closing section of the volume consists of several critical book reviews that engage with recent scholarship on religion and history. One review examines ‘The Buddhist Conception of Spirits’, a study of the preta doctrine. The reviewer notes that the author distinguishes pretas from the more familiar notions of ghosts and emphasises that Buddhist texts describe them as suffering beings inhabiting an intermediate realm. While appreciating the book’s documentation of how local beliefs shaped Buddhist cosmology, the reviewer criticises some arbitrary categorizations and calls for closer attention to the textual sources. Another review discusses D. C. Sahu’s treatise on the origin of the Chalukya dynasty. Sahu argues that the Chalukyas were of Gurjara origin and migrated southward before establishing their kingdom in the Deccan. The reviewer finds this thesis improbable, pointing out that early records portray the Chalukyas as indigenous to the south and that the Gurjara connection is based on tenuous linguistic similarities. The review recommends a more careful evaluation of epigraphic evidence. Other notices cover works on Buddhist philosophy, the chronology of Indian dynasties and recent archaeological discoveries. Collectively, the reviews highlight the vigour of contemporary historical research while also cautioning against speculative hypotheses. The reviewers praise thorough documentation and critical methodology and urge scholars to avoid over‑reliance on limited or ambiguous evidence. In doing so, the section underscores the importance of balanced, evidence‑based scholarship in understanding India’s past.

Conclusion

The review section closes the volume by offering balanced appraisals of recent historical studies. It applauds works that ground their arguments in solid textual and archaeological evidence and challenges those built on conjecture. By encouraging rigorous analysis and critical debate, the reviewers aim to advance the field and deter unwarranted speculation.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Continue reading

Related articles

Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Book Review: Translations of Canonical Texts from Prakrit into English

By Unexhibited

July - 1982
Jinamanjari

Book Reviews

By Jack C. Laughlin, Tinamarie Jones, Binod Kumar Tiwary, T. V. G. Sastri, Jyoti Prasad Jain

1999
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Reviews

By Ananda Kentish Coomaraswamy, Satkari Mookherjree, Mano Mohan Ghosh, Benoy Kumar Sarkar, U. N. Ghoshal, Dhirendra Chandra Ganguly, Chintaharan Chakravarti, Batakrishna Ghosh, Vidhushekhara Bhattacharya, Jagadish Narayan Sarkar

June - 1935
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Book Reviews

By Satya Ranjan Banerjee, Ram Krishna Bhattacharya

October - 2002
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Reviews

By Jadunath Sarkar

March - 1935
Sambodhi

Review: Prof. K. D. Bajpai Commemoration Volume 2

By Narayan M. Kansara

1992-93