Skip to content
Browse articles

Sri Harsa, the King-Poet (The Authorship of Sri Harsa)

By Nani Gopal Banerjee

Vol. 12 · No. 3September - 1936pp. 504–510English

Summary

Sri Harsa, the King-Poet, addresses debates over his authorship of three dramas, with scholars like Bana attributing works to the king due to doubts sparked by Nigoji’s comments on Mammata’s reference to Harsa gifting gold to Bana. While Bana claims the gift followed the vindication of Harsa’s character, historians dismiss this as proof. Evidence from I-tsing and Dimodaragupta supports Harsa’s authorship, though later works like *Maduna-parijata* were misattributed to royal patrons. Sodhala’s account clarifies that Harsa’s gift symbolized imperial fortune, not payment for authorship. Harsa’s *Ratnavali* reflects his warrior identity, drawing parallels to the Ekavali episode from Bana’s *Harsacarita*. The drama’s themes of victory and imperial power mirror Harsa’s military triumphs, particularly in Kalinga, corroborated by contemporary inscriptions. His cosmopolitan religious outlook and lofty sentiments in *Sarvasvadina* further underscore his authorship. Despite Bana’s claims, historical and textual evidence solidifies Harsa’s role as the King-Poet, though later misattributions persist.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

This analysis resolves longstanding debates about Sri Harsa’s authorship by synthesizing textual, historical, and literary evidence. It demonstrates that early 8th-century sources, including contemporary accounts and performance records, consistently attribute the three dramas to Harsa, countering later scholarly doubts. The study highlights the cultural context of patronage and misattribution, emphasizing how works like *Maduna-parijata* were later wrongly credited to royal figures. By examining Harsa’s thematic focus on warrior ideals, cosmopolitan spirituality, and philosophical depth, the paper reaffirms his centrality to Sanskrit drama and his enduring legacy as both ruler and poet. The findings solidify Harsa’s place in literary history while offering a model for reassessing contested authorship in ancient texts.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The Pandits of the cld School disputed Harsa’s authorship of the three Dramas and held that Bina was the real author.”
  • “It is clear and elaborate enough not 10 give rise to any misconception, The tradition according 10 Sodhala runs:—Harsa was the king, who while seated among his learned men in the samsad ૪/૩૩ really u lover of learning though his name implied *‘a lover of royal-fortune,'"”

Works cited in this article

  1. Dimodaragupta
  2. Guekwad's Oriental Scries
  3. Hieuen Tsang

Discussed in this article

People

Texts & works

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Nani Gopal Banerjee

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

A New Light On Durgotsava

By Nani Gopal Banerjee

September - 1945
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Sri-Harsa, the King-Poet

By Nani Gopal Banerjee

December - 1936